• pHr34kY@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    8 months ago

    I find it strange that people call it user-friendly, despite it doing a lot of things hostile to the user.

    • Kyouki@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Just more in the neighborhood of being used or understanding something because it has been given to them from a very young age on. So getting familiar and used to it very young age on makes it “friendly” even though it is more “familiarity”.

      Linux is always going to be really awkward at first but over the course of time you learn and shy away and develop your own kinda workflow and that’s the beauty of it in my opinion.

    • Honytawk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Because user-friendly means that even a tech-noob can easily set it up and use it right away without much researching.

      • If an OS requires ANY AMOUNT of command line, you have lost about half the population.

      • If an OS asks any remotely difficult question with techno lingo, you have lost an other quarter.

      • If an OS doesn’t work out of the box the way it should (like all their hardware functioning including audio), you have lost all the other not technology inclined people.

      Windows is setup that it requires none of that. It may do something that you find horrific, but most people do not care as long as it works.

      • pHr34kY@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Windows devices are set up like that.

        If you give someone a blank hard drive and Windows install media, they need to to all of those things.

        • Honytawk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Have you installed Windows 10 or 11 lately?

          The most difficult part are the partitions, but even that is done mostly automatically and doesn’t allow you to continue if your setup wouldn’t work.

          It comes with decent default drivers for most generic hardware, and automatically installs drivers for more exotic hardware if it supports Windows Updates.

          And it most definitely does not require a single command line.

          Maybe some technical jargon, but even that you can just skip by pressing next and it won’t fuck up anything.

          • pHr34kY@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Yes, it required a command line to perform disk partitioning and even a basic pre-erase.

            It also asked about 20 more questions than necessary, and I had to answer “no” to each and every one of them.

            Where Linux asks for a username, Windows insisted multiple time that I had to create an account. The only workaround was to physically unplug the Ethernet cable.

            There’s also a step where you need to lie about your regional settings to avoid getting plastered with preinstalled trash.

            If you blindly click “next” through a Windows install, you will get the most bloated, horrible, invasive experience possible.

            There Windows installer is an absolute fucking minefield.

      • SorteKanin@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        If an OS requires ANY AMOUNT of command line, you have lost about half the population.

        Half? It’s way more than half.

    • helenslunch@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      “user friendly” doesn’t mean “in the users’ best interests”, it means “easy to use”.