• Dave@lemmy.nzM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    They would not do it if they didn’t think it could save them more money than it costs.

    • SamC@lemmy.nzOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, but that will be based on some funky valuations of “brand” and “mindshare” that someone has pulled out of their ass.

      • Dave@lemmy.nzM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Most likely that is involved. But I’d guess there are some significant savings to be made if they can streamline their storebrand products to use the one brand, reuse the same ads in NZ & Oz, etc.

    • deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Don’t forget their accounting will include some amount of goodwill of their various brands.

      There are data-driven marketers but they are few and far between.