• ME5SENGER_24@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    So don’t accept them. Force Amazon to full create their own full-fledged shipping company, like UPS or FedEx. I’m not talking last mile delivery but full fledged end-to-end delivery. They’re the second richest retailer behind Walmart, the can afford it and will most likely trickle down the cost to buyers.

    • HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Considering how hard the mail service has been nailed in modern times I’d rather they just took what they could get.

      • protist@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        USPS is doing just fine in terms of volume. They absolutely do not need Amazon’s business to remain in the black. The bad things you hear are mostly far right anti-USPS propaganda, they’ve been doing their best to weaken it for many years

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Lemmy: The world is literally burning from fossil fuel and manufacturing!

      Yep.

      Also lemmy: Amazon’s rich so they should just create a gigantic shipping fleet.

      LOL wut?

      Most of my Amazon deliveries come via the USPS, and that guy is coming by my house every day, no matter what.

      • Maalus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        If only there were two different people that have those opinions huh, instead we have just one hypocrite

    • UsernameHere@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      TLDR Amazon is making taxpayers fund their business model by dumping their work on USPS and pocketing the payment.

    • BrikoXOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      More like Amazon dumping their unrealistic loads on USPS since they have no infrastructure to handle them. The original contract was for 2 big US cities, but now Amazon wants to expand it to small cities without providing the same support they were required to do for those 2 big cities.

        • BrikoXOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          You mean the federal government that can be easily bought? And the contract is secret, so nobody knows what it entails.

          Let me remind you that the current Postmaster General is Louis DeJoy who used to be a CEO of a for-profit shipping company and has no experience in the public sector. And he’s known to take bribes.

            • BrikoXOPM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Two things can be true at the same time. Nobody is disputing the contract existing or it being profitable for USPS, they got 1,9 billion from Amazon in 2019 from that contract which covered 2 big cities. The issue is it expanding to small cities that don’t have the same requirements the original contract had for the 2 big cities.

              If you don’t see the problem with a random Amazon package being given priority over time sensitive bills or paychecks, you need to reexamine your perspective.

                • BrikoXOPM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  USPS offices in small city has no say in which contracts gets accepted by the Postmaster General and the board…