• KepBen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 year ago

    Weird to me how hypothetical a landlord’s “job” is compared to, y’know, any actual job.

    • Dkarma@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      21
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah they’re all parasites unless I’m demanding they fix something then I need them and life sucks unless they do a bunch of work.
      People love to trash landlords for not working 24/7 the same way they trash teachers for having summers off, but when it rains it pours for landlords and problems always come at the worst time.

      There are good landlords and there are bad landlords. Just like tenants.

      • Datboi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        1 year ago

        The difference here is teachers provide a valuable service, and landlords do not. I don’t care how good the good ones are, their entire job is “had enough money some years ago to buy a building, and now lives off other people’s income”.

        In all my years renting from individuals to big property management companies, good and bad alike, never was it easy to get things fixed which is apparently the only advantage to renting. Days/weeks/months go by, all the while I’m dumping money into their pockets for the privilege.

        At least when owning, the money I have to spend on my mortgage and repairs is going toward the value of my house, and not the ethereal void that is a landlord.

        • Zoboomafoo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Landlords do provide a service. You said it yourself, they handle building maintenance. Are they generally lazy and overcharging, also yes

          • Honytawk
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            A proper landlord pays someone to maintain their buildings.

            The landlord does nothing except sit on their arse and collect money they use to pay the people to maintain their properties.

      • kool_newt@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Even if a particular landlord is a decent person otherwise, landlording is wrong. It is the hoarding of essential resources to for the purposes of being released for profit. If landlording was restricted to renting vacation houses (in appropriate areas) or something it might be OK.

        The advantages of a rental (not worrying directly about maintenance, just paying someone to take care of it) can be had with a property management company.

        • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Being a nonprofit landlord is also ok, imo. If you’re just charging enough to pay the mortgage, taxes, insurance, upkeep, etc. then you’re using your equity or credit score to help another person have a place to live when they wouldn’t otherwise be able to qualify for a loan. If I’m ever in a position to be a landlord, I’ll probably do it that way; and by the time you pay the equivalent of the cost of the home in rent if you want to own the place, I’ll sign it over to you. Kind of a rent-to-own thing.