Yes, because there is a basic assumption. Those projects arenāt consumer-facing games. Those are hobbies. You know it and you are simply arguing in bad faith. I know actual game developers who released their games for free or under a pay-what-you-want model. They refuse to do so again because they canāt support themselves by doing it. I am a game developer and I wonāt release my games for free because I need to support myself. There is all the data you need. Find me other data saying otherwise.
I know actual game developers who released their games for free or under a pay-what-you-want model. They refuse to do so again because they canāt support themselves by doing it. I am a game developer and I wonāt release my games for free because I need to support myself. There is all the data you need.
Not at all. I just assumed you understood the basics of quality.
you never mentioned āqualityā until you wanted to disqualify data that didnāt support your position.
Yes, because there is a basic assumption. Those projects arenāt consumer-facing games. Those are hobbies. You know it and you are simply arguing in bad faith. I know actual game developers who released their games for free or under a pay-what-you-want model. They refuse to do so again because they canāt support themselves by doing it. I am a game developer and I wonāt release my games for free because I need to support myself. There is all the data you need. Find me other data saying otherwise.
this is rich coming from someone who is moving the goal posts.
the plural of āanecdoteā is not ādataā
Itās more relevant data than you are providing.
your insistence on relevance is giving the lie to your denial about moving the goalposts.