• aksdb@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    9 months ago

    IMO the common sense part isn’t “oh right of course those are germs”, but following the observation that points to some correlation. They don’t have to know or understand the root cause to at least consider (or accept) that something is wrong.

    • Slotos@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      That’s the scientific part. Conventional wisdom, on the other hand, is often neither.

    • gandalf_der_12te@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Well, I’m not so sure about that. Consider this:

      Quantum Mechanics (QM) makes accurate statements and predictions about a lot of physical experiments.

      That doesn’t mean, however, that the theory in especially well-liked, especially among common people. There are a lot of people who think that QM is incorrect, or at least incomplete, simply because it contradicts their intuition.

      • aksdb@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        But that’s a good thing. If everyone considers the status quo as final, no one would research anything. It’s fine to question stuff, if you at least follow scientific methodologies. Just saying “nah, I don’t buy it” and then leaning back doing nothing is just lazy, and not critical thinking.