Beeper — All your chats in one app. Yes, really.
www.beeper.com
A single app to chat on iMessage, WhatsApp, and 13 other chat networks. You can search, snooze, or archive messages. And with a unified inbox, you’ll never miss a message again.

It promises to be the one-in-all chatting app, based on matrix, providing compatibility to other apps (Telegram, Signal, WhatsApp etc.) through bridges.

So what do you think, from a privacy point of view and also user friendliness on the other hand?

  • borlax@lemmy.borlax.com
    18·
    1 year ago

    I don’t think very highly of a cloud based app asking me for my credentials for every other cloud based app I used.

  • merde alors@sh.itjust.works
    13·
    1 year ago

    if Lorem Ipsum is the first information i have about an app, i don’t need to think about it. This is from their webpage 👉

  • SleepyBear@lemmy.myspamtrap.com
    13·
    1 year ago

    “ For example, if you send a message from Beeper to a friend on WhatsApp, the message is encrypted on your Beeper client, sent to the Beeper web service, which decrypts and re-encrypts the message with WhatsApp’s proprietary encryption protocol.”

    So, not really end to end for most common use-cases.

    • fulano@lemmy.eco.br
      1·
      1 year ago

      I was thinking it was something like what pidgin does on desktop, adapted for mobile, and was highly enthusiastic, but realized it works using matrix bridges and doesn’t process locally…

      Well, at least it can be self hosted.

      • SleepyBear@lemmy.myspamtrap.com
        2·
        1 year ago

        Given this is !privacy and the advertise as front page features both “works will all your messaging apps” and “end to end encryption”, it seems important to flag currently those aren’t mutually compatible.

        It’s not their fault the apps don’t have e2e APIs, it’s a tough problem, but the secrecy and privacy guarantee is just “trust us to stick to our policy”. And they’re a start-up, tooling isn’t perfect (or even exist), mistakes happen, etc

        Their self-hosting looks interesting, but then it said to use your own clients too, which took the fun out of that.

        • asap@feddit.de
          1·
          1 year ago

          it said to use your own clients too, which took the fun out of that.

          You can use Element, which is essentially the same thing as Beeper’s client:

          https://element.io/

  • Eigengrau@kbin.social
    7·
    1 year ago

    In order to provide the service, Beeper collects device information, including OS, hardware, public IP addresses, network routing information, information on the installed Beeper client, and other device settings.

    🤔

  • Makss@jlai.lu
    4·
    1 year ago

    This seems too good to be true, but deserves to be tested. Apparently, you have the option to self host your web service, in case you don’t want to give them your data.

  • metaltoilet@beehaw.orgEnglish
    1·
    1 year ago

    I’ve been on the waitlist for a while and am excited to get through. It may suck but it’s worth testing. The privacy issues aren’t ideal but it doesn’t seem like they sell your data.

  • Alivrah@lemmy.world
    1·
    1 year ago

    Isn’t this just adding another potential point of failure to every single service you add to it? Hard pass.

  • Echolot@kbin.social
    11·
    1 year ago

    I like it so far, seems to work reliably and the client is leaps better than any other Matrix client on iOS.
    Haven’t checked out the option to self host the bridges yet but it’s on my list.