• Primarily0617@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Because the focus wouldn’t be on profit just for profit’s sake

    what socioeconomic system has existed where increased productivity was viewed as a bad thing?

    e.g.:

    • pure feudalism would’ve led to economies of scale because it would make the king of the castle wealthier.
    • any kind of socialism with a centrally planned economy would’ve led to economies of scale because it enables the government to more easily meet the needs of the people.
    • even pure marxist communism probably would’ve led to economies of scale eventually because any communities that worked together on a global scale would’ve been more prosperous for their community members, which is still a goal of the system

    The technologies just allowed it

    or in other words, their invention led to it, which was the original quote I was responding to

    Plus, technologies are not sentient, you can’t blame a technology…

    • socio-economic systems aren’t sentient either
    • nobody’s “blaming” a technology—there isn’t even really a consensus in this thread on whether economies of scale leading to increased meat consumption is a good or bad thing