• Shawdow194@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      11 months ago

      That’s an interesting point!

      Any animal that changes or metamorphosises into a different animal technically has a less than 100% mortality rate

      • fossphi@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        11 months ago

        Hmm, interesting indeed! I get what you’re trying to say, but I would also tend to believe that it’s still the same animal? If not that, then wouldn’t the caterpillar cease to exist when it metamorphosised into something else?

        • Albbi@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          11 months ago

          Caterpillar is not actually an animal though, it’s a stage of life.

        • Shawdow194@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          11 months ago

          I would also lean closer towards ‘same animal’ but its physical morphology undergoes such drastic changes its definitely blurred lines

          Psychologically I think there are tests that show butterflies and moths retain memories from pre-metamorphisis stages

          Metaphysical questions are so cool just because we may never be able to answer them!!!

          • fossphi@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            As mentioned in one of the comments, since caterpillar is just a stage of life, I guess it isn’t as much of a contradiction/paradox then.

            But yes, stuff like this is loads of fun! :D

    • Cralder@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      11 months ago

      “Caterpillar” is not a species. It’s a stage of some animals’ life cycle. It means 99% of catepillars die before they become butterflies or moths or whatever

      • NoSpotOfGround@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        So caterpillars do have a chance to be “immortal” and transcend instead to a superior state of existence* at the end of their time. Whoa.

        *that is, unfortunately, very mortal.

      • averagedrunk@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        I wish it were 100% in tomato hornworms. Seeing that 99% of them die before turning into moths makes me think all of the surviving ones just hang out in my garden.

  • saltnotsugar@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    11 months ago

    The problem is they they’re just designed to eat and get chonky. If they had invested in cool ninja combat during evolution, scientists believe they would be not only more likely to survive, but be a lot cooler.

      • dumples@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        11 months ago

        Most caterpillars are mildly poisonous since they only eat a single type of plant so they are immune to the plants poisonous effect. That gets into their fleshy hotdog body. Unfortunately most birds are also mostly immune.

      • saltnotsugar@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        Due to Newtons 46th law of awesomeness, Ninjas are still cooler than spikes, but still are pretty dang cool.

    • deft@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      sometimes i wonder if life is sort of designed to be like that though. not in a strictly intentional intelligent way but also not in a fully accidental coincidental way.

      somebody has to turn plant into food right? without them and homies like them our food system don’t work.

      • GoodbyeBlueMonday@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        11 months ago

        It’s designed that way in the same way as a hole was designed for a puddle*. The caterpillars are evolutionarily successful because of a “spray and pray” strategy, and other species are successful because of the easy food.

        Biology is an arms race, in a sense: so everything is interlinked, and affected by everything else, even if only by distant, myriad links in an unbroken web of chains. It’s the reason a lot of biologists like myself are anxious about the ecological destruction that’s been unfolding for so long. Life finds a way in the long term, but short term…it sucks to be alive when many of the things you depend on aren’t.

        *This metaphor thanks to Douglas Adams

  • BanjoShepard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    11 months ago

    Has anyone run them through HotDogNotHotDog app analysis? Maybe they’re not just nature’s hotdogs, and we’re missing out.

  • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Alien species discovers earth … “Holy shit Kang! These little bipeds are delicious! And all you have to do is support whatever community or belief they follow and they’ll go anywhere you tell them”

    • Cralder@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      “Caterpillar” is not a species. It’s a stage of some animals’ life cycle. It means 99% of catepillars die before they become butterflies or moths or whatever

      • StorminNorman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Yeah, they’re also wrong about jellyfish being the only immortal animals. Gotta love being confidently incorrect…

          • StorminNorman@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            The hydra. There’s a species of worm (pretty sure it’s a flatworm, could be a round one though). Technically, lobsters are too. They also aren’t cos growing their news shells is incredibly taxing and that’s how the old ones usually succumb, but yeah, genetically, they do the whole telomere regeneration shit. Their DNA is like 17yo when they die at age 130. So, yeah.

              • StorminNorman@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                Oh ffs. I swear to god we don’t deserve the internet. I literally pointed out that lobsters do die. The reason we can consider em immortal is cos they clean up their telomere damage. You colossal idiot. You’re trying to trip me up and “expose” me, but you can’t even get the fundamentals right…