• distantsounds@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’d suggest reading the article. It’s here in the comments several times. The video of the hearing is well worth watching and pretty significant. That video is also here in the comments.

      • mpa92643@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        But this guy says another guy told him he knows guys that have worked on the UFOs! That’s practically proof of aliens!

      • distantsounds@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        The hearing was never about presenting evidence. It is about creating a safe and transparent process for reporting unidentified flying objects. Then and only then could we have an actual discussion on anything further regarding the potential of extraterrestrials if credible evidence exists.

            • PM_me_your_vagina_thanks@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              The republicans organised the whole thing, AOC was just there, doing her job. But yes, for her part in this I do view her as more of a moron than I used to.

              • SCB@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                Hey you’re definitely ignorant of the hearing, and making a take based on a headline, but at least you’re consistent.

                  • SCB@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    If you’d watched the hearing you’d have heard both her line of questioning and her insistence on follow-up hearings, and wouldn’t have played it off as “just doing her job”

                    Why even lie about such a simple thing?

    • hoodatninja@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Name one part of that hearing that was significant, because not only did he not have any evidence, he didn’t have any evidence that there is evidence. I watched it and frankly I want my time back.

      • SCB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes a person specifically employed to find information who then reports said information is 100% the same as dumb shit you said on a playground.

        Exactly the same.

              • SCB@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                The evidence and witness info provided have the committee members calling for a select committee with subpoena powers.

                When Grusch said “I can’t say that here” that was never going to be the end of that discussion

                  • SCB@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    A select committee is not “every committee by default.” A select committee is a specific committee.

                    Also you may want to revisit the last sentence of paragraph 1.

                    And no, the entire hearing was credible.

                    Frankly if it’s nothing, you don’t have to give a shit. The members of Congress think it’s something, and I agree with them.