balderdash to memes@lemmy.world · edit-21 year agoEDIT: I THINK I STAND CORRECTEDimagemessage-square221fedilinkarrow-up1346arrow-down155file-text
arrow-up1291arrow-down1imageEDIT: I THINK I STAND CORRECTEDbalderdash to memes@lemmy.world · edit-21 year agomessage-square221fedilinkfile-text
I considered deleting the post, but this seems more cowardly than just admitting I was wrong. But TIL something!
minus-squareTheObviousSolution@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up15arrow-down1·1 year agoThis is wrong. Having an infinite amount of something is like dividing by zero - you can’t. What you can have is something approach an infinite amount, and when it does, you can compare the rate of approach to infinity, which is what matters.
This is wrong. Having an infinite amount of something is like dividing by zero - you can’t. What you can have is something approach an infinite amount, and when it does, you can compare the rate of approach to infinity, which is what matters.
deleted by creator