• Aceticon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Lynx gang!

      (Edit: love it that somebody gave me a downvote for mentioning the Lynx browser)

      • Dicska@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        6 months ago

        Alright, 10 bucks for the first developer that makes a YouTube ASCII art plugin for Lynx.

        • Ook the Librarian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Have you played with caca in vlc? I wouldn’t know how to get into lynx but it seems it’s most of the way there. % vlc --vout caca video.ogg

          • Dicska@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            I was kind of joking, but the serious part came from the time I worked at an office with strict browsing rules, so I had to resort to lynx to avoid suspicion. I know an ASCII art video wouldn’t look innocent anyway, but I was just simply thinking if it’s possible at all particularly in lynx.

      • renzev@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Hey there based lynx user! I’ve been thinking of switching to lynx (or w3m or similar) for reading text-heavy websites like documentation and blogs and stuff, but I find it really annoying how in every terminal browser that I tried, the text stretches across the entire screen. It’s kind of annoying reading such long lines, at least for me. Do you know if lynx (or any other terminal browser) has some sort of option to set a maximum width for web pages?

        • Aceticon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          It’s been over a decade since I last used Lynx, only really mentioned it because it’s cool, if not very practical in this day and age of GUIs.

          So the short answers is “no”.

          Sorry.

    • EvokerKing@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      58
      ·
      6 months ago

      I’d rather use spyware than that piece of garbage. So many things are missing or broken. Ik it’s smaller and open source but that doesn’t mean it’s the best solution. I’m waiting for arc to come out on Windows.

      • hswolf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        42
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        FF is a perfectly good browser with as many features as any other.

        Even has pioneered some of them like the picture-in-picture that lets you overlay videos.

        Could you provide specifics on why you don’t like It? Or what’s “broken”?

        • EvokerKing@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          6 months ago

          There’s a lot of things but especially that of developer tools. They are horrible and I often run into many things going wrong when using it such as elements not showing at all and weird versions of errors showing in the console. It also has issues with site compatibility from a development standpoint. Many commonly used Web standards (as shown by mozillas own documentation) are just not present on Firefox. I remember there being complaints over Microsoft teams or YouTube not working on Firefox. People blamed Microsoft and Google, but it was actually mozillas fault for not adding standard web elements and JavaScript functions.

          • hswolf@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            6 months ago

            I agree with the developer tools take, they are sometimes unresponsive and difficult to read or analyse, especially snapshots.

            Now, I have to disagree about the web standards, all major current browsers are W3C compliant, and developing under those guidelines is an interchangeable operation between browsers.

            But of course, this a market, and browsers will one-up one another for a higher market share. Google for example has been pushing forward almost a new set of guidelines for Chrome, which has a gigantic market share; and those, while widely used, are not the norm, they should be namespaces, we as developers are bound to have to deal with these edge cases unfortunately.

            I understand where the frustration is coming from, Mozilla isn’t a saint, but with the current state of browsers, you can’t possibly say that Firefox is a bad choice, overall It does everything a modern browser is supposed to do.

            I’d even say it’s a better option now than It has ever been.

            • EvokerKing@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              But still why would I want to use it? Even if it’s Google’s fault that things don’t work, things still don’t work. I’m not going to use something worse because there might be “spyware” in chrome. Which by the way, is just them collecting data for themselves, not selling data like face book or tiktok does.

      • Skipcast@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        6 months ago

        What’s broken and missing exactly? Everything works fine for me except experimental features such as webgpu for example

        • not_again@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          6 months ago

          Named tab groups.

          Don’t get me wrong…I still use FF on Linux, but this is the one thing I miss…and the extension don’t seem to work as well as native groups…