• jaamulberry @beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I see this as a big issue for content going forward. I get that reddit is one single point of failure but I wonder how you can keep knowledge in a static state when most instances lose money and it’s a hobby. What happens when the owner grows tired.

    • Big P@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Could also be an issue from a data privacy perspective. If I want to delete comments I left, but the instance I made them on has shut down how can I delete them?

    • intensely_human@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Perhaps each client should keep data. Something like a blockchain, with redundant copies stored on clients and clients using some consensus protocol to agree on what the real history is.

      • Square Singer@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Blockchain is the worst possible solution for this. There are much better versions of this.

        Also, no need for clients to keep gigabytes or even terrabytes of data. That’s what you have instances for.

      • jaamulberry @beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s not about visiting a forum post I made in 2007. It’s about visiting a forum post about an obscure issue that someone solved in 2007.

          • Wahots@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            This is so stupidly relevant to strange motherboard problems. I hope that lemmy is able to be scraped by web crawlers to help assist with these sorts of problems in the future.

        • Ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          That part won’t change. If your current instance was federated with an obscure community/instance before that community/instance disappeared, then you will still have the content from back then and will be able to find the discussion and solution

            • Ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              1 year ago

              Well no, but then you weren’t going to find it anyway, even if the other instance was still around

              • jaamulberry @beehaw.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I would argue the instance still gets indexed by Google and if it was around I could Google search for the result.

                • Ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Ok, but in that instance, unless that niche instance that disappeared never federated with anyone, then their content is going to be available on the instances they did federate with before they went away, and those will continue to show in google

        • capacitor@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          It would certainly be nice to replace stack overflow with a good Lemmy instance, but have the data guaranteed to remain around.

        • Square Singer@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          That still works with replication. What won’t work is having any discussion going forward be replicated over all replications. But the replication works fine for archival purpouses.