Why is the recent news around the LK-99 room-temperature superconductor such a big deal? What material impact would those findings have on electronics and modern technology?

  • Fermion@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Quantum computing needs to be cold to avoid thermal noise from destroying coherence. A room temperature superconductor probably doesn’t enable room temperature quantum computing.

      • Fermion@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        At the temps needed, regular copper is superconducting.

        It could be helpful in some of the intermediary stages to reduce heat production, but it’s not going to be a major linchpin for quantum computing. They’ll still need cryostats and liquid helium cooling.

    • Sem@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think that if you can scale your physical qubits easily you will be able to use all the power of error correction codes. Even a thousand of physical qubits per one logical qubit should be feasible if you do not need to support superconductivity by helium coolers.

      • Fermion@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Error correction relies on the majority of values to remain unchanged. I don’t think that assumption holds for qubits at room temperature. I’ll admit that I’m not well read enough to be certain.

        Room temperature superconductors would be great for a lot of applications, but I don’t think they do that much to enable quantum computing.