Tap the account switcher in the top left corner and you should see the option.

See my comment for a screenshot. I don’t know why I can’t seem to post a screenshot in the body of post. Every time I try it gets removed.

    • dreamfall@lemmy.worldEnglish
      131·
      1 year ago

      As much as I browsed reddit throughout the day for the past 5 years…$20 seems like nothing. Hell I spend $10 a month of a few Patreons for ad free content.

    • Neve8028@lemm.eeEnglish
      71·
      1 year ago

      It is but it also isn’t. I paid $5 for sync pro for reddit and have gotten literally thousands of hours out of it. $20 isn’t that significant in the grand scheme of things if you like the app.

    • nudny ekscentryk@szmer.infoEnglish
      51·
      1 year ago

      I’m on the verge. Let’s be honest, it’s fucking expensive. Where I live it’s pretty much an entire day’s worth of work to buy this app remove ads. I understand LJ wanting to be paid for his work, but this steep pricing seems like he doesn’t believe in Lemmy and just wants to capitalise on it before it eventually goes to shit. Let me just point out greed was what originally drived us all off reddit.

      • 👁️👄👁️@lemm.eeEnglish
        3·
        1 year ago

        Well to make it bearable, set your DNS to an adblocking like dns.aguard-dns.com and the ads will just be blank cuz they’re blocked.

        • nudny ekscentryk@szmer.infoEnglish
          2·
          1 year ago

          I have adaway, I don’t see them anyway (or perhaps because I’m in EU? Apparently revoking tracking permission removes ads?)

    • dumblederp@lemmy.worldEnglish
      3·
      1 year ago

      I bet if they sold a version called Sync-Budget for $4 they’d sell more than five times the amount than Sync-Ultimate.

    • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.orgEnglish
      41·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, that’s insane. Also the experience IMHO is not supreme vs something like Summit. I don’t really understand the hype.

      • 👁️👄👁️@lemm.eeEnglish
        1·
        1 year ago

        First actual full featured client, so timing is a huge advantage. Maybe we’ll see a price dip when Boost for Lemmy comes out.

    • grabyourmotherskeys@lemmy.worldEnglish
      31·
      1 year ago

      I’m doing the ultra at about $23 cdn per year. $2 a month for an app I use about 300 times a day for years seems like a good deal.

      • usualsuspect191@lemmy.caEnglish
        25·
        1 year ago

        I’m not going to argue with what you’re happy to pay, I’m just curious why you are doing the math based on how much you use it instead of some other metric like the amount of labour it took to produce or maybe how much ad revenue you need to replace?

        I see $23/year for a few years equaling the cost of outright owning a AAA video game (that will receive support and updates for years to follow too) that took millions of dollars and many thousands of man-hours to produce and it doesn’t add up…

        • akim@lemmy.worldEnglish
          2·
          1 year ago

          These triple a games are expected to be sold in the millions. $20 is about enough for one hour of works in terms of labour. This times expected sales, which are on the thousands at max for Lemmy, and you got what it takes to develop an app like this.

          • usualsuspect191@lemmy.caEnglish
            2·
            1 year ago

            I agree $20 isn’t all that much on its own (for a developer it’s likely only a third of an hour really) but that’s kind of the point. One person’s full-time development wage is less than that of 30 people, so why charge just as much just because the audience is much smaller? It seems what you’re saying is that Sync isn’t currently viable and needs to be over priced (for a comparable product) to survive.

            Also, wouldn’t Sync be the equivalent of an indie game in this comparison? Why don’t those games have to charge more than the AAA games to make up for the smaller customer base?

        • Sl00k@programming.devEnglish
          0·
          1 year ago

          I can turn it back around on you and say why do you think the worth is detached from how much usage it gets from its users? If anything something we use and enjoy using should be getting more rather than a one off AAA game we’ll enjoy for 20 hours one month.

          • usualsuspect191@lemmy.caEnglish
            12·
            1 year ago

            There’s a resource and human effort cost that is the backing behind the pricing of most things. I’m actually having a very difficult time thinking of something that’s priced strictly based on the time+enjoyment metric without factoring labour+material at all outside of maybe famous works or art or other things that are “valuable” simply because they are rare. Are you able to provide an example of something commonly sold that would follow the time+enjoyment pricing scheme to help me wrap my head it?

            A cruise and a staycation don’t cost the same even if they’re for the same duration, even if you get sick on the cruise and have to cut the trip short. It feels like you’re saying “I actually really enjoy the staycation, and even though more resources go into a cruise, I’ll gladly pay more to stay at home then go on the cruise” and that can’t possibly be what you’re saying…

          • usualsuspect191@lemmy.caEnglish
            13·
            1 year ago

            Boy do I have some stuff to sell you then! How much do you happen to enjoy air would you say?

              • usualsuspect191@lemmy.caEnglish
                11·
                1 year ago

                That comment was actually meant to be to someone else lol. Oh well, wanna join my promising business opportunity? This thread has a bunch of potential suckers customers

    • Aux@lemmy.worldEnglish
      0·
      1 year ago

      Life in London is very very expensive, it’s one of the most expensive cities in the world. And Sync author lives in London. I live in London myself and I can see his price as fair, lol.

    • Dave@lemmy.nzEnglish
      276·
      1 year ago

      You’re not paying to remove ads. You’re supporting the development and making it worthwhile for the developer to continue to create the app.

      That it happens to remove ads is just a side benefit. You can remove ads from all apps using a VPN based ad blocker anyway (on android).

      • PownyRyda@lemmy.worldEnglish
        221·
        1 year ago

        I paid €2.51 to remove ads on Sync for Reddit. I would have spent maybe a tenner but it’s over €20 for the Lemmy app. As much as I love Sync, that’s a big nope from me.

        • redcalcium@lemmy.instituteEnglish
          143·
          1 year ago

          Remember, Lemmy has a lot less active users than Reddit. Even if ALL active Lemmy users on Lemmy.world buy the app at its original $2 price, it’s still not enough to sustain full time development. Both higher one time purchase price and subscription is needed for the app’s survival, even then I’m still not sure if it’s enough for the dev to sustain themselves. I’m getting the ultra subscription for this reason because I don’t want the app to go away, and I encourage people that really like the app to do so as well.

      • Knightfall@lemmy.caEnglish
        132·
        1 year ago

        No, we’re paying to remove ads. And $26 CDN to remove ads feels really high when I paid $3.69 to remove ads in Boost and $4.49 to remove ads in Relay in 2019.

        I like how you bothered to speak of supporting the dev yet mentioned how to stop ads with a VPN based blocker.

        • sudo_tee@lemmy.worldEnglish
          51·
          1 year ago

          Yes it is steep for me in Quebec with taxes it is 31 $ . But I had the option to use 20$ in google play credits from Google rewards. 11$ is an ok deal. Remember that sync is the first Lemmy app from former Reddit devs and that the developer worked really hard to release it.

          • Knightfall@lemmy.caEnglish
            2·
            1 year ago

            I am aware of the scenario. Sync for Lemmy is not just relaunching into a fresh world here. The dev shouldn’t come in with unreasonable pricing. Not when we can use very nice apps such as Connect instead for free, and ad free.

        • Dave@lemmy.nzEnglish
          33·
          1 year ago

          Paying to remove ads is supporting the dev. This is doubly true when you can get no ads without paying (though sync will still have blank spots where the ads were supposed to go).

      • El_Rocha@lm.put.tfEnglish
        71·
        1 year ago

        Yes we are paying to remove ads.

        If people want to keep supporting the dev, just buy the subscription or check if he has a donations link. But this purchase is just what it says: Remove Ads.

        • Dave@lemmy.nzEnglish
          4·
          1 year ago

          Sure, but if you’re someone who wants sync specifically (say, if you used it for reddit), then you need to support it if you want it to stay in development.

          • AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social
            72·
            1 year ago

            It’s just really weird to pay twenty dollars to not have ads on a platform that doesn’t inherently have ads - a platform that has been purposefully designed to avoid the needs for ads or the trappings of capitalism. To voluntarily reinfect yourself into that ecosystem seems at best weird, and at worst sort of a violation of what the fediverse is about.

            • redcalcium@lemmy.instituteEnglish
              7·
              1 year ago

              I understand the sentiment. Most devs that release Lemmy apps do so as a side projects. They don’t make money doing it. In fact, they actually losing money and time to work on their side projects. It’s actually amazing how many apps we now have in just a short time.

              That being said, Sync developer is one of a few dev who work on a lemmy app full time. This results in higher quality app, even though it’s still in beta right now. But since he’s literally doing this for a living, he’ll need to make some money to continue his work. People was begging for him to make an app for Lemmy, and he actually does it. Whether he’ll continue doing this or not will depends on whether he can make a living or not. And since the market for Lemmy apps is so small, there is no other choice but to charge a higher price to make the calculus works. For a lot of people that rooting for him, paying $20 or $17/year is no brainer if it means they get to have their favorite app working on Lemmy.

              • AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social
                1·
                1 year ago

                If there’s no other choice why is it the only app making that choice? I also don’t think that proprietary closed, profit incentivized systems are inherently better. The kbin PWA app is beyond sufficient.

                • redcalcium@lemmy.instituteEnglish
                  1·
                  1 year ago

                  I’m not saying there is no other choice. Lemmy core devs are paid by a grant to work on Lemmy full time for example. Other apps developers may have a different funding model (donation, or even out of their own pocket), but for Sync, the dev is a commercial app developer so he does what he do best: making a paid app.

            • Gxost@lemmy.worldEnglish
              1·
              1 year ago

              This platform needs money to keep going. If donations do not cover expenses, it will either find funding or just close. So, it may end up using “trappings of capitalism”.

                • Gxost@lemmy.worldEnglish
                  1·
                  1 year ago

                  I was talking about servers, not client apps.

                  Regarding the app, yes, $20 is too expensive for just turning off ads. Moon Reader Pro asks $8 for an ad-free experience, and yet I think it’s a bit too much for me. But it’s a market, and demand will correct the price. If nobody pays $20 to disable ads, the devs can consider reducing the price, at least temporarily. So I don’t see any problems here.

                  As for totally free apps, I consider them as a sort of gift. Some people are giving away the results of their labor for free, maybe because it’s their hobby, or because of ideology, but definitely because they have spare time to work on their apps. But it can change, and active development can stop. The only thing able to motivate them to continue the work is a profit, allowing them to spend some time without sacrificing anything else. We can end up with ads, subscriptions, single-time payments, or maybe just donations. I think it’s inevitable for active projects.

                • Apathy Tree@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
                  0·
                  1 year ago

                  The market will definitely speak on this one since the platform itself isn’t monetized and there are tons of other options for those who don’t want to pay that much. If it ends up not being workable, it won’t be workable, and the model will need to adapt or fold.

                  I’d never pay that much for a phone app, personally, especially on android, because I’ve had apps that change dramatically to the point I no longer like/can use them. It’s a bit better on iOS because the devices are supported a lot longer with OS updates (literally the reason I switched after a lifetime with android flexibility - sick of apps not working and my phones not being supported officially for more than 2 years).

                  This isn’t to say I won’t pay for things I want and support - I did pay for a Plex lifetime subscription like 9 years ago ($100, it’s 120 now, and a large amount of paying for it is app access, but also managed home users so my close friends/family can be logged in to my account directly without impacting me in any way) because the value was well worth it after subscribing month to month to test it and using the free version for several years prior. The value for what I paid has increased substantially with new features and just simple longevity. The model seems to work well enough for what they provide, both to them and to their users. I can swap to another self-host if it falls apart, but in the 12 or so years I’ve been using it, only a small number of changes have negatively impacted me, and only slightly (tho I paid early, so if features were paywalled after being free, I’m not aware of it, tho they have made some previously paid things free, like plexamp). I can skip server updates and roll them back easily if it stops working with my OS, and my users wouldn’t know the difference for a long time.

                  This tends not to be the case with mobile apps because devices are constantly changing, and side-loading apks can be a challenge for your average person. It’s a lot less static overall than pc hardware, so app-breaking updates on older mobile hardware are way way more likely. I can’t afford new phones all the time, so that’s a problem to me.

                  I’m looking at the relative useful lifecycle of the software. If I can get maybe a couple years before my OS version isn’t properly supported to run the app anymore, and it’s difficult to fix without upgrading hardware or rooting and flashing (not something everyone can or wants to do), I probably don’t want it. I turned off automatic app updates for years because of this issue, but they stop working after a while anyway.

    • maniajack@lemmy.worldEnglish
      98·
      1 year ago

      Last thread was complaints of not wanting subscriptions this thread is complaints of too expensive 🤷. By all means keep the ads or use another app. Imo it’s not super surprising to be pricey when it’s a one time purchase instead of the subscription.

        • maniajack@lemmy.worldEnglish
          13·
          1 year ago

          Having paid $6 for reddit sync probably over a decade ago while the dev has maintained and improved the app over those years with no additional money from me, I think I got a pretty good deal. It’s definitely a calculation to make but I don’t think $20 would have been unreasonable a decade ago and I don’t really think it is now. Maybe also dont forget to put some blame on reddit, the dev got fucked there and has to rebuild the customer base that would have included recurring payment customers (unlike me).

      • Countmacula@lemmy.worldEnglish
        74·
        1 year ago

        Welcome to the internet

        “We want this”

        “No not like that”

        Sync is good enough to get 20 bucks easily. If I wasn’t on iPhone, I would immediately.

    • dreamfall@lemmy.worldEnglish
      98·
      1 year ago

      God forbid you pay $20 once to support the dev and for an app you’ll use 1-2 hours a day for potentially the rest of your life…yet you’ll pay $10 for a streaming service you’ll never touch for months on end…

    • citizen_lemmy@lemmy.worldEnglish
      18·
      1 year ago

      Jesus, dude! It’s a one-time payment for lifetime of no adds! Plus you support the developer.

      People are spoiled.

      • WigglingWalrus@feddit.ukEnglish
        2·
        1 year ago

        Quite the opposite. I already block ads, I want to support the developer. But I don’t want a subscription nor do I want to pay a huge fee for one app. I use a lot of apps and it’s not feasible to pay that much for each one.

  • the_moosen@lemm.eeEnglish
    161·
    1 year ago

    That’s so aggressive just to remove ads. I get it that devs need to eat but holy shit man.

    • FlagonOfMe@sh.itjust.worksOPEnglish
      202·
      1 year ago

      I think people (me included) have a very poor sense of what apps are worth.

      $20 for an app you use nearly every day for years is unthinkable.

      $20 for a single decent meal at a restaurant is fine.

      Seems odd to me that anyone should think $20 spent on an excellent app is too much.

      • ugh@lemm.eeEnglish
        5·
        1 year ago

        I think the issue is that Lemmy is still developing and we don’t know what it’s going to look like even 6 months from now. $20 for unlimited access isn’t bad at all if you know you’ll get your money’s worth. I’m still hesitant with Lemmy because there are features that it lacks. I’m optimistic that they will be added, but I can’t be sure.

        • novettam@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish
          1·
          1 year ago

          Same here but after 6 years of using Sync I know what I get out of Sync, my hesitation is only in regard to the Lemmy project itself.

      • the_moosen@lemm.eeEnglish
        1·
        1 year ago

        I have a hard time justifying $20 for a mobile app. I don’t think I’ve spent more than $5.99 on an app and I used play rewards money so it wasn’t even mine.

      • dreamfall@lemmy.worldEnglish
        55·
        1 year ago

        It’s okay… whiners on this thread will spend $20 for two Starbucks drinks which last you minutes of taste enjoyment…but browse Sync everyday and complain $20 for life is too much…

        • rambos@lemm.eeEnglish
          1·
          1 year ago

          Not trying to say that 20 is a lot, but 10$ coffee sounds like im not drinking coffee

  • blastofffox@lemmy.worldEnglish
    151·
    1 year ago

    ₹9900 for lifetime ultra, this is expensive. Entry level smartphones that the majority of Indians use costs much less than that.

    • Elderos@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
      11·
      1 year ago

      It is not friendly to regional pricing. Can’t really blame the dev since their own bill are probably in dollars, but I think I’ll pass myself as it is fairly expensive for an app here. I could buy like 3 or 4 full video games for the price.

    • targetx@programming.devEnglish
      1·
      1 year ago

      There was some talk on Discord about making the pricing regional, no idea on timeline though. But it does not sound reasonable if that’s half a monthly entry salary for you!

  • voxel@sopuli.xyzEnglish
    141·
    1 year ago

    way too expensive.
    also no regional pricing?
    I would never pay more then 10$ for a full game, let alone 20$ for lack of random black rectangles in a free app.

      • voxel@sopuli.xyzEnglish
        1·
        1 year ago

        ah, right my fault.
        apparently just having an American account on your device forces all prices to be in usd

    • 1984@lemmy.todayEnglish
      39·
      1 year ago

      I think you are bit stingy then. Or maybe you can’t afford it I guess. But 8 dollars is nothing these days. It’s a burger.

      • voxel@sopuli.xyzEnglish
        3·
        1 year ago

        burger is 2-3$ here, around 1$ for a McDonald’s cheeseburger (the cheapest option in the menu), i would rather buy like 10-15 burgers for that price.

        • 1984@lemmy.todayEnglish
          01·
          1 year ago

          Yeah sorry, math is hard for my brain right now appearently… :)

  • psychic717@lemmy.worldEnglish
    143·
    1 year ago

    Sync was Reddit for me and I didn’t even think about buying pro at the time (around 3€ I think).

    Paying 23€ for ad removal is just being greedy right now, I really want to support the dev but this is just too much.

  • UnrealRealityX@lemmy.worldEnglish
    9·
    1 year ago

    it was 12.99 for a hot second if you grabbed it when it first went live. I was thinking about it, but then saw it went to 19.99 just recently. Imma gonna wait.

  • mintiefresh@lemmy.caEnglish
    9·
    1 year ago

    I paid to remove the ads. I want to support the developer and this is the best Reddit app I used as well.

    Having said that, this is a really steep price tbh and will be a hard sell for my friends. I am loyal to Sync and still see value in this price since I use it so much. But it really is steep.

    • CethinEnglish
      1·
      1 year ago

      The issue is that Reddit had a lot more users. More niche products need to be priced higher to compensate for much fewer customers. It is fairly pricy, but you’re paying to support development. You can choose to use free, another app, or do it yourself. There’s not going to be any work done if there’s no money available though.

  • Gearheart@lemmy.worldEnglish
    9·
    1 year ago

    Can anyone confirm, and this may have Already been answered.

    Does the remove adds on the left pane, remove them for lifetime at 20$?

    Edit: seems like 20$ will be ads removed lifetime but No fancy features.

    • N1NJ4W4RR10R_@aussie.zoneEnglish
      3·
      1 year ago

      Edit: seems like 20$ will be ads removed lifetime but No fancy features.

      As far as I can tell this is the case. Fair enough with how long Sync for Reddit lasted.

      I saw someone saying there would be an ultra lifetime payment option coming as well, although not a part of the discord so can’t confirm that.

  • blastofffox@lemmy.worldEnglish
    7·
    1 year ago

    2000₹ for removing ads is too much. With that money one can buy a raspberry pi and set up pihole to block ads on their whole network.

  • youthinkyouknowme@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
    92·
    1 year ago

    Just got the update and… Yeah, it’s almost $100 on my currency. I’m not sure if I ever saw an app this expensive before, not that I buy a lot of apps, but still. Love the app and lj has always been awesome, but will have to pass :(