I can’t imagine an scenario where BG3 doesn’t win the GOTY.

Is that true in real-world terms, though?

Considering how the AI technology works today, yes, I believe it is true. We can feed an AI model 100,000 images of animals and then play with it to see what “new” animals it creates… But that is no innovation for me. The technology may get there, eventually, but it is not at that point now.

Because as is, one can spend only a tiny effort using ChatGPT and generate medium-sized works of fiction that are functionally brand-new. Yes-- I realise that they’re still ultimately based on material they’ve been fed, but the more material they’ve absorbed, I imagine the less that’s necessarily a constraint.

Still. We can get the AI to mix multiple styles to the point that the outcome is disguised, or so loosely related to the original sources that one cannot recognize the parts, but even then, this is not what innovation is.

On top of that, is there anything preventing the prompter from doing the heavy-lifting of ‘innovation,’ creating the skeleton of the plot, while ChatGPT fleshes it all out?

Agreed. If the AI operator (or handler) adds their own input then the outcome becomes, at least partially, innovation. I have already used AI text tools for my work, and modified the outcome to fit my needs and preferences. It may not be innovation, but it is also not 100% AI as I have added my own input.

That is no the case with this post and the Moebius “AI generated art” examples. Making a claim that text based prompts generating Moebius art is innovation is…well… an insult to Moebius.

In the other hand, if I was an actual artist, using AI to mix my own art with Moebius art, that is another story. One could call that innovation, with some reserves.

Btw, Cabeza-- thanks for creating this thoughtful thread of scenarios and art. It’s nice to have discussions like these, and these issues clearly aren’t going away.

I am happy to collaborate with our community!

And it’s interesting that it creates art like Moebius but what about the next artist who goes off with their own innovative style?

This is a good point. At the current stage, AI can copy, but can’t innovate… I wonder if it will ever reach that point.

So AI can create pretty pictures but it still struggles to create coherent comics.

Correct, but for how long? Eventually an AI user (artist or not) will be able to create proper storylines.

I also use Automatic 1111 and get my models from Civitai. I just wasn’t familiar with the model you are using. I will check it out. Thanks.

Is this just the model and the VAE or you use something else to create all these?

If you could share your workflow that would be great. Thanks.

I have eaten in an Ethiopian restaurant once and didn’t enjoy it.

Their food is way too spicy and the Injera too sour.

Of course this is just my taste… Others may love it, specially if spicy food is their thing.

Thanks for the post.

I didn’t notice when I checked the series that some of the books are companion books. I will look into this again.

I was aware it is the authors third book and not the first but choose this one as the previous ones weren’t available in the online store I was buying, it had good reviews and my understanding is that most of these series are stand-alone volumes with almost no connections with the previous ones.

If I helps I think you are doing great things for this community. I may not always comment or make posts of my own but from time to time I always check the community and go over all the new posts I have not read.

What community?

Stop having match threads and then you can rest assured no soccer community will ever form around here.

My comment was not about the bot but about the human (@[email protected]) that post the match threads for everyone’s benefit.

I am not sure what you call main r/soccer page or separate r/soccer. Perhaps something to do with how you browse reddit. I used to browse reddit with an app (RIF) and old.reddit.com and there was no such separation. Furthermore, they not only have match threads but also post-match threads, goal threads and sometimes threads for red cards, tackles, VAR… and so on.

Obviously we don’t need all that around here but we need at least one post per match thread… That is the bare minimum to have, and that is why I remain strongly opposed to OP.

https://kittensgame.com/web/

Is free, but you need a Doctorate to play it + a lot of time.

Source: I played POE 2300 hours and I barely understood half of its mechanics.

@[email protected]

Please read my comment here: https://lemmy.world/comment/4129234

I am not sure if you just took the advice from one person or if there was proper discussion but know that I think is way better to keep one thread per game. Perhaps we can have more discussion about this, maybe a poll?

BTW, know that your job in this community is impressive and awesome. I am thankful for that. Keep it up!

I am strongly against this recommendation. The reason being that I am very happy with having one quick access post per top level game. That was one of the main features in r/soccer and I consider a luxury that we can have the same approach here in Lemmy.

Not having that will destroy the community for me.

Tremendo gol de Valverde!

I have blocked so many meme communities… Is like Lemmy is 50% memes.

Angel Correa MVP today.

Yeah, I have a tablet, which is where I tried to read digital comics. I didn’t use my smartphone, desktop pc or laptop.

I admit that digital reading is suitable for graphic novels but considering that I work with a computer I value anything that I fit into my schedule that doesn’t require screen time. That is the advantage of physical books for me.

Thanks for answering. I will check out the FAQ!

I tried in the past to get used to reading digitally and it didn’t work for me. One of the reasons that I read graphic novels is to reduce my time in front of the screens.