1. Elon wants more money
2. Elon wants X to be profitable now
3. He wants to destroy X so Bluesky can take the throne
4. He wants Truth Socia to be profitable

But if Elonjet is in Bluesky https://bsky.app/profile/elonjet.net

Why do you compare OpenAI to a thief?

I’m asking out of curiosity

I think this method is not convincing for companies, because they prefer more power and to do it on their own, because they don’t want their ideas to be replicated.

Open AI has different priorities they want to achieve AGI, so they seek to explore the capabilities of AI not look at what competency does in those directions to replicate and/or improve it. They only optimize it to make their services faster and less resource consuming.

Also, becoming a for-profit organization doesn’t mean you eliminate your non-profit division. Those two parts separate and become independent, although the nonprofit ends up getting considerable funds from the funding offer received by the other part.

As is the case with Mastercard, whose nonprofit organization is one of the richest in the world. In that scenario Mozilla would split into two entities one would focus on making a profit and making Firefox more competitive, while the other would focus on what Mozilla currently does.

The fact that there is AI with open source licenses is already a good thing, as is the competition. Although in my opinion it is not enough because it can further consolidate oligopolies in this sector.

Trying to prevent OpenAI from becoming a for-profit seems to me to be a questionable tactic. It’s as if Mozilla wanted to be a for-profit company in order to make Firefox more competitive with Chrome, but Google opposes this measure.

Well, I agree that we don’t know what the situation will look like over time.

There may be a limit that will cause another AI winter, driving companies away for a while because they invested money and received little.

Transformers may remain relevant or end up being obsolete, although there are still many papers related to AI in one way or another.

And what are those examples of those who continue training old weights?

And in that case, will the Llama fork be the same as the Meta fork? We are talking about AI that has a considerable development, companies would probably not participate because it is not an open source license and its clause limits in those aspects.

Also you have to think that if the new version of Llama with the new license is 3 times better than Llama with the previous license, do you really think that the community will continue to develop the previous version?

I understand, but Meta has the rights to Llama and at any time they can change that license to make it less open just to make more money.

Currently it is open weight to attract customers, because once there are no competitors they will start to squeeze them.

It seems normal to me that a company takes questionable actions to avoid more competition.

If Open AI becomes for-profit, it will have more resources to finance itself. It is currently in a similar situation to Mozilla, and it is not the first case, there have been several.

One example was Mastercard, but in the process it created a foundation with the same name and it is also very rich. Open AI will probably follow a similar path

Also, Llama is not open source according to the OSI

Politicians will blame the X-Men for this.

If that happened in the United States, Republicans or Democrats would be blaming themselves for this event.

Everything will be fine if they don’t decide to test the reactors with inexperienced people.

Nothing ever happens unless the secret channels of both powers are closed.

And at the same time they will offer a premium plan in which there are no ads.

Let’s just hope that Jay Graber is another Jack Dorsey and that the company Bluesky is bought by an Elon Musk 2.0

It is normal for politicians to offer condolences to a deceased person who was rich out of respect and not to tarnish his image.

Now, with regard to the death of the CEO of that company, it does not affect much because those who made that decision were more people. It is like when a high-ranking government official dies, it does not change much.

Memphis Police: They’re Just Like Haitians