18-24 usually gets grouped together for census and survey stuff so you got a good year left in the tank before you’re part of the 25-44 crowd

It refers to either a limited time reward structure where you pay for the ability to earn rewards such as cosmetics or other perks in multiplayer games such Fortnite and Valorant (If you don’t earn the needed XP within the designated timeframe then you may not even get those rewards you paid for) or access to DLC content in general for both single and multiplayer games where some functionality/maps/modes are gated behind a single or recurring payment.

Some RNG manips are straight up harder than just hunting them in SV tbh. Anyone can get/buy a Pokemon Home account with 1000 genned shinies if they wanted to so it’s up to you to determine what you consider “legit”. I enjoy hitting timing required to get shinies through RNG manips so I do it. Some people think gen 9 shinies are too “cheap” and others don’t use shiny charms and only hunt full odds (but still hunt on multiple systems at once for whatever reason). It’s a weird rabbithole to go down so just do what you want. No one is going to grade your shinies.

Biden sent $8 billion in weapons immediately before he left office and Trump reversed the pause on 2,000lb bombs and sent $1 billion immediately after taking office

You clearly don’t care about whether or not 2,000lb bombs were available and in use. You just care about whether a performative gesture was made.

And they clearly never ran out of 2,000lb bombs to use. They just happened to need some more now.

Yup, he just sent them at least 14,000 of them before doing that. More than all other bombs combined according to leaks. 2000 pounds bombs were in use in September in Lebanon.

A lot of Dearborn’s Arab population is Palestinian and Lebanese and had/have family at risk of being killed. You know when those 2,000 pound bombs get shipped to Israel they actually get dropped on people and kill them, right?

You’re a low information voter

Motherfucker, literally 65% voted for women.

You’re scapegoating 40,000 people who have lost family members in the genocide for not voting for the killers and using Dearborn as a slur at this point. Less people voted for Trump there than the national average. Keep proving you’re a Nazi.

This discussion is specifically about Gaza and the region. Gaza would have still be demolished during a Harris administration and the political goals of the Israeli regime would be unchanged.

Yes, Trump and his ilk are horrible for Americans and world stability. That has been the case for a decade unfortunately the opposition hasn’t been able to garner enough votes to beat an incredibly unpopular candidate by forcing even more unpopular candidates on people for 3 consecutive elections. Blame people who voted for Trump for him being in office but don’t blame people who did not vote for his opposition for the opposition’s failure to provide compelling candidates. It’s no different than Trump blaming the EU for not buying more US products.

https://lemmynsfw.com/

What do you think was going to happen under the democrats?

Her stated position was identical to that of Biden as he signed off on the mass slaughter: No end to weapon shipments or any tangible support to current admin. Just the meaningless promise of a two state solution for the fiftieth year and reaffirmations of “Israel’s right to defend itself”. Plain as day to anyone who isn’t a party loyalist. Even Trump was somewhat more diplomatic about his position pre-election. If she had taken a different position, she would be in the white house today and we both know it (and that has nothing to do with protest votes and is just how elections work).

Trump is continuing what Biden started and Harris would have continued. The United States’ fully bipartisan, murderous foreign policy is a stain on humanity and anyone who supports candidates with murderous policy is culpable.

75th percentile

I think it would be incredibly hard to get people to switch without a compelling reason. Keep in mind that our modern keyboard layout is 150+ years old despite alternatives existing. Arabic letters are very close to English ones in sound but the readability suffers for me at least because it’s written in cursive with a lot of very similar-looking shapes (think of an i with 1 dot on top and an i with 2 dots being 2 separate letters) necessitating bigger font sizes.

English is about half of the internet and the modern lingua franca so unless it gets replaced or evolves over time, either of which would take decades, I don’t think any central body could make that change.

I cant read arabic without zooming in a lot more than I do for latin text

At the time of your first comment you had not. Why would I say something nasty about jews??? You’re being deliberately obtuse and making questionable assumptions. Not continuing a bad faith discussion.