I think it’s important to make note of the fact that they were banned on Reddit for good reason
Reddit is an echo chamber. Being banned there is not indicative of anything.
I think it’s important to make note of the fact that they were banned on Reddit for good reason
Reddit is an echo chamber. Being banned there is not indicative of anything.
we don’t know that denuvo ACTUALLY impacts sale numbers by convincing those mean old pirates to buy their game
But we do know it improves sales, that’s why every game publisher that can afford it is using it. They have years of data to prove it. What do you have?
This same logic could be used to argue that the government forced people to get the covid vaccine.
Flagg Center Church? As in Randall Flagg?
Did you read the article? The title of this post is false.
The article doesn’t say that. The title is false.
That claim is not on the article. Did anybody read it?
Have you ever used cheats on single player games when that was still a thing developers put in games? I did, it was fun. That’s why.
Reddit mods should be renamed spez’s bitches.
I remember a similar case regarding Windows shipping with IE. Whatever happened with that?
There’s currently nothing stopping a mod from creating a bot to do the same. Maybe it’s already a thing.
Do you have an example of a technology that is more efficient than human labor, doesn’t have those side effects and was successfully held back just to keep jobs?
I like being able to say what I want without being banned by a power-tripping mod
There’s currently nothing stopping a mod from creating a bot that deletes comments below certain threshold or that bans users for commenting on communities they don’t approve like they did on Reddit. Only site policies can prevent that.
Nobody cared at all
The mods cared. There were many bots used by moderators that relied on karma, the main one being automoderator.
Yes it does. Some filtering is done by reddit and some by the mods. Also your votes don’t count if you don’t have certain amount of karma accumulated on the sub you are voting.
Lemmy only has the voting per individual post and comment, but doesn’t accumulate this as a sidewide score.
Lemmy does have a karma system. Here’s yours.
I tried it on these platforms:
The union negotiations could include in the contract that AI generated actors are not allowed when SAG is involved.
Ok, but if they want to ban all forms of AI then we are no longer just talking about the morally reprehensible example of a studio buying an actor’s likeness in perpetuity. They want AI gone even when it’s used in a more sensible way which is understandable from their point of view but less so for the rest of us.
They want to pay for an actor’s likeness once then own it for a lifetime.
But isn’t trying to forbid those kind of deals doomed to fail? What if the digital actor doesn’t look like anybody? What if they scan actors from other countries?
<a history of union achievements in Australia>
I’m not arguing about the benefits of unionization, my question was about what happens when a machine becomes more efficient than a human worker. Do you think a union could have saved the switchboard operators? How is it any different from this scenario?
The paper this article is based on is from 2009. I’d argue that’s against rule 5.