And your considering people to be of lesser value than yourself is noted.
And that’s fully my right and that’s normal. Nobody owes you anything.
I’m sure you’ll be a help when the genocide comes.
You’ve just devalued this word a little bit only to support your own arrogance. This shows that I’m correct.
By the way, my strategy in such conversations is defined by just one realization in my childhood - that for any genocide I don’t want to be an accomplice.
There are a few factors, one of them is your value as a person.
Why would you say that if that’s false?
What is my value as a person?
And your question makes absolutely no sense.
Negligible, like the effort to type this sentence.
I’ll repeat - why would you say that I “admitted” something when I didn’t?
https://www.lsd.law/define/tacit-admission
And your considering people to be of lesser value than yourself is noted. I’m sure you’ll be a help when the genocide comes.
And that’s fully my right and that’s normal. Nobody owes you anything.
You’ve just devalued this word a little bit only to support your own arrogance. This shows that I’m correct.
By the way, my strategy in such conversations is defined by just one realization in my childhood - that for any genocide I don’t want to be an accomplice.
Yes, I know it’s your right to consider people subhuman. And yes, that’s normal. Normal for genocide.
Subhumans don’t deserve human rights, now do they?
Don’t say you don’t want to be an accomplice to genocide if you talk about human beings as if they aren’t humans.
You are a shitty human being, now get off me
Interesting accusation coming from someone who made a vague accusation about me, refused to clarify, then lied about clarifying.
Seems sort of a shitty way to behave to me, but I’m not the one who judges this sort of thing.
OK, you’ve owned everybody with facts and logic, now go away