• solsangraal
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    118
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    if you have to source your war machines from DPRK… you might be losing

    • rustyfish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      91
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Russia is not loosing. This is just part of the 5D chess Putin is playing. Any minute he will make his master move and conquer Ukraine, destroy NATO and fingerbang your dad. Just wait. You’ll see.

            • harrys_balzac@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              19
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              4 months ago

              That’s very generous, thinking Putin would ever stick his dick in any of these tankies’ holes.

              They’re all just useful idiots, not even worth a bag of onions.

            • Ferrous@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              46
              ·
              4 months ago

              Oh my bad, for some strange reason I had assumed you were talking about Putin in a comment chain devoted to talking about Putin.

                • Ferrous@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  37
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  Bruh, you literally just linked to a paragraph that makes the claim that the idea of a three-day conquest came purely out of American and Ukrainian speculation. This is exactly what I’m saying, save for that one Lukashenko quote.

                  I’m not going to get into the weeds with you about the invasion, but I am going to call you out for sheisty implied quotes. Any reasonable and adequately uninformed person would read your “three day war” comment in response to a comment chain about putin and assume you were talking about putin. You deserve to get called out for that. It’s misleading and disingenuous.

                  • ArgentRaven@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    26
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    4 months ago

                    I didn’t even know Putin claimed he’d take Kyiv in 3 days until you said something and got all upset about it, brochacho. But now that you made us all look it up, I’m definitely repeating it to everyone, everywhere.

                    Can you tell me more things that make Putin look like a fool? Since that seems to be what your goal is.

              • Devorlon
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                4 months ago

                I wouldn’t say the comment chain is talking about Putin, but someone aggrandising Putin.

                • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  14
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  They’ve moved on from “Putin didn’t say that” to “it was just speculation” because this was never actually about Putin to them, it was about justifying Russia’s invasion.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      That’s the problem. This is an old school war. If Russia can keep moving the front lines the correct direction them nothing else matters. I don’t say this because I like Russia but because it shows how much more support we need to be giving Ukraine. The manpower difference is something like 4 to 1. The casualty ratio is something like 3 to 1 which is high but within Russian standards. If nothing changes Russia will win this in another few years.

      • Crashumbc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        There’s a lot of truth to that unfortunately. Historically, Russia has shown many times that any number of casualties is acceptable .

        • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Historically inaccurate, and if they were sustaining “just” 1 in 4 they’re literally run out of guys before Ukraine.

        • skulblaka@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          If all that they have to continue throwing at this war is casualties, Ukraine has already won. Russia may have plenty of meat left but they do not have equipment left. And no war, especially a modern one, is going to be won without equipment and vehicles. Ukraine has NATO support behind them and Russia has… North Korea, maybe China if they’re feeling charitable that day.

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        I mean, nothing changing is a big ask, on both sides. It’s still up in the air, and hinges on the American election more than anything else at this moment.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          4 months ago

          Yeah we’re sorry about that. We still don’t know how we let our biggest adversary of the last 70 years infiltrate an entire political party.