It’s pretty easy to spot dark patterns when you look out for them, but I found a pretty obvious example of this.

Stoofie is a brand that sells water fountains for your pet (I don’t know what the problem with a water bowl is, but I digress). WayBack Machine

Plastered at the top of their website is “33% OFF Ends Today- Free Shipping” with no way to dismiss it. There is a scrolling text under the main image “FAST AND FREE SHIPPING 60-DAY FREE RETURNS”

If you scroll down, you’re immediately introduced with a product with the option to buy two preselected. The rest of this section explains itself:

Other things are sprinkled in the main page, but it really is the prime example of dark patterns. I am personally sick of finding them, but would love to see more examples of what others have found. Please, share your favorite examples of dark patterns. Don’t forget to archive them first so they can never be lived down.

  • TranquilTurbulence
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    66
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Most cookie consent dialogues:

    1. There’s only one big accept button
    2. If the decline button even exists, it’s grey whereas the other one is green.
    3. The decline option could be buried deep under other menus.
    4. The sizes of the buttons

    Most companies are trying to actively manipulate you to accept all cookies, but nowadays there are a few companies that don’t resort to any of these dirty tricks.

    • Samsy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      The one that scares me the most is:

      Accept all or Settings

      And you have to opt out 5-10 buttons and at the end there is a “save settings” or the “accept all” button again in green.

      Who has time for this shit? Just for a stupid article? We need laws against these.

        • nous@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          2 months ago

          Oh they care. They care a lot. Particularly that you don’t have any so they can sell all your details to any bidder.

          • TranquilTurbulence
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            2 months ago

            They care about it so much that they probably have a full time UI designer whose job is to figure out new ways to trick and manipulate users to hand out even more data.

        • alien@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          2 months ago

          Exactly. It should be as easy to decline all cookies as it is to accept. And user’s consent can’t be implicit.

      • TranquilTurbulence
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        Oh I remember those thoroughly cursed menus where you have to manually disable 256 cookies one by one. Haven’t seen those in a while though, so I guess some piece of legislation is doing its job.

      • Miss Millie@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        That’s actually a nightmare

        Who has time for this shit? Just for a stupid article?

        Won’t using reader mode ( if your browser supports it ) help you avoid this ? or those browser add-ons like " I don’t care about cookies "

      • Uranium 🟩@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’m honestly surprised no-one has built an extension to automatically opt out of them, or at least the major cookie providers interfaces.

        I realise there are many extensions which outright block cookies, etc; I’m meaning specifically the annoying dialogues you describe

      • TranquilTurbulence
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        Based on the number of partners some companies seem to have, they are far more promiscuous than most humans.

    • MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Yeah, EU fixed that somewhat, it has to be privacy-by-default now, the save choice being pre-selected and obvious and etc. But most dialogues are now illegal; no legal entity complains, nobody fixes it.