Highlighting the recent report of users and admins being unable to delete images, and how Trust & Safety tooling is currently lacking.

  • Emily (she/her)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Likewise, an open source project can totally die if they refuse to engage with the needs of the users. The lack of moderation and content management tools have been a longstanding criticism of Lemmy, and instances will migrate to alternatives that address these concerns. It is a genuine legal liability for instance operators if they are unable to sufficiently delete CSAM/illegal content or comply with EU regulations.

    • Eyck_of_denesle
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      But opensource projects are more likely to get dropped by devs than losing their userbase from what I’ve seen. I could be wrong. Both our points are true. That’s the best part of fediverse. If one doesn’t like lemmy, they are free to choose an alternative. I just don’t agree with demanding features from open source developers. There is a distinct line between demanding and requesting. I’m not saying lemmy is perfect. Maybe Sublinks would be better. Let’s wait. But even Sublinks won’t be sustainable if users do not respect developers time and patience.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        10 months ago

        I think there is also a distinct line between demanding, for example, a new animated avatar feature and demanding a way to delete child porn.