The war on video game mods that involve Pokémon continues! I can’t say for sure that the Pokémon Company’s renewed focus on taking down anything relating to these mods for 3rd party vid…

  • Kairos@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’m like 90% sure the form says “under penalty of perjury I confirm that these statements are accurate and true.”

    • Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      The original DMCA wording was very very harsh when it came to frivolous fillings. Hopefully it won’t shock you to believe that it’s rarely enforced and almost never enforced for large Corpos.

    • D61 [any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Sure there’s words there but are they actually legally actionable? Like something in an EULA that says, we reserve the right to delete this from your hardware if you don’t sent us a cookie every six months. Its there… but it doesn’t matter.

        • D61 [any]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Not everything in a contract would be allowed to be enforced by law… so no.

          Try writing a contract that includes voluntary cannibalism, let it get out to the public, and see if the police just let that slide.