• stoy
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    8 months ago

    I prefer living i a nice suburb with excellent public transport to get to work in the city.

    Just like I have been doing for all my life (:

    The city is a place you visit, and then come home to your nice suburb walk home from the bus stop along a small, quiet canal, sometimes there is an event in the park you pass through, else it is just quiet.

    Need to get to work in the city center? Get on the bus that departs every 5-10 min during rush hour, 30 min later switch to the underground that departs every 5 min, switch lines, get off 15 and walk to the office, arrive 45 min after you left home having slept or watched videos on your commute.

      • stoy
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        8 months ago

        Nope, not if you build it before selling land and building houses.

        Here in Sweden, it usually works like this:

        The municilapity decide to develop some land, this includes public transport, in lower density areas a few well placed bus stops is all that is needed, they connect with the suburb center, and might even have a few lines connecting further away, the suburb center usually has a train station and a small shopping center, the train then takes you further along to your destination.

        If you don’t build public transport during or before construction of the neighbourhood then it will obviously be a higher cost. But build it before or during construction and it will be quite resonable