• rustydomino@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    Can someone explain from a technical standpoint how they can block OpenVPN running on port 443? my admittedly limited understanding is that port 443 is the common port for https. If they blocked that port wouldn’t that mean that they would be blocking nearly the entire internet?

    • float@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t know what they actually do but one possibly is to look for (absence of) the TLS handshake. Or maybe they simply infect all devices on the Chinese market with MITM certificates to be able to decrypt all TLS encrypted traffic. Should be easy to force companies to do that in such a country.

      • Shan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        1 year ago

        The port isn’t their focus, they’re looking at the protocol that is being used, regardless of the port. The protocol is still visible when not doing deep packet inspection. That’s why there suggesting a socks proxy for Russian citizens, because that uses HTTPS to tunnel traffic, so it wouldn’t be caught up in protocol analysis.

        • binom@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          can you maybe link some ressources on how the protocol used can be detected? i did not know about this and would like to read into it some more :)

          • noride@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Look up NBAR for the basic idea. Each vendor has their own ‘secret sauce’ implementation, Palo Alto only needs 9 bytes of payload for disambiguation, iirc.

    • Too Lazy Didn't Name@lemmy.woodward.tech
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      From my understanding, they are most likely just blocking the defualt port of wireguard / openvpn and IPs associated with the VPN servers of VPN providers they dont like.

      If they wanted to block VPN traffic over 443 to any IP, they would have to do deep packet inspection, which I would imagine is infeasible for Russia.

      Supposedly, the Chinese great firewall does use deep packet inspection, so it is possible to do this at the country level.

      • targetx@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        They specifically mention it’s on the protocol level which would imply it’s doing more than just blocking some ports. Not sure why you’d think China could pull that off but it would be infeasible for Russia?

    • Aux@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You can analyze the traffic, detect common patterns and also detect source of the request. Russian IT specialists are now using very complex solutions to come around the block which work a lot like MITM attacks.