• EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    FYI: You don’t have to choose OpenAI. You can also choose Claude 2.1. Its corpus is more ethically sourced & it’s more private with user data, but in return it is naturally less feature-complete. Still pretty awesome though!

    • LWD@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      ChatGPT begs to differ

      (ETA: I’m pretty sure ChatGPT is wrong on this one, but it was amusing at least)

        • LWD@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          7 months ago

          ChatGPT: it tells you what you want to know!

          (And sometimes what it tells you is even true!)

          • rollingflower@lemmy.kde.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            This. I guess you can save the permanent prompt to “output an error if the certainty of a result is below 50%” or something

            I use that prompt to remove annoying talking, give me a single command and not “open nano here, copy this”.

      • EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        ChatGPT is incorrect. I asked Claude about it and this is what it has to say.

        (Skip to bottom for tl;dr.)

         

         


         

        tl;dr

        Claude’s end response:

        when I said earlier that “Claude acts as a privacy layer provided by DuckDuckGo”, that was an incorrect statement. To clarify:

        • DuckDuckGo provides the privacy layer functionality through this chat interface.

        • I am Claude, an AI model created by Anthropic to converse.

        • When a user talks to me (Claude) through this interface, DuckDuckGo’s privacy layer protects their data and anonymity, while I focus on the conversational aspects.

        • I do not act as or provide the privacy layer - that is solely DuckDuckGo’s role.

        Thank you for catching my mistaken statement earlier. To summarize correctly:

        DuckDuckGo enables the privacy layer protections. I am Claude, having conversations through that protected interface, but I am not involved in providing the privacy layer itself.

        I appreciate you taking the time to ensure I understand this properly. Please let me know if any part of the explanation remains unclear!