• SuperSaiyanSwag
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      11 months ago

      Yea, one thing I would love to see on Lemmy that I rarely saw on Reddit are level-headed gamers when it came to controversies.

      • Neato@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        11 months ago

        Civility argument is about protecting the powerful. Let people have opinions. We all know why people are upset. Downplaying it just makes someone sound like an apologist.

        • GunnarRunnar@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          People are voicing their opinions, what’s the big deal? We should all agree with these gamer tantrums?

          • macniel@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            17
            ·
            11 months ago

            We should all agree with these gamer tantrums?

            no, why should we? But should gobble up the lies and the shit corpos give to use? No, absolutely not.

            • ampersandrew@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              11 months ago

              No, I would think the proper response is to stop playing this game and giving it attention rather than continuing to play it but leaving a negative review. Whatever, we’re all free to do as we please, but the decision making doesn’t make a lot of sense to me. It’s also clearly not the worst game on Steam, because people still want to play it.

      • whatisallthis@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Why is it on the reviewer to be level-headed and not the consumer?

        Take some personal responsibility. If you see a game at 1/10, read the reviews. Do some research.

        You’ll get much further teaching yourself to be smart instead of teaching society to be smart.

    • macniel@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      it belongs there because its simply Overwatch 1 without all the features promissed for Overwatch 2. 80 gigabytes from /dev/random has more worth that this “game” and its cheaper!

      • GunnarRunnar@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        11 months ago

        For sure, agreed. Major downgrade and when I tried it at launch it still had the same queue problems OW1 had so not like they even fixed anything for a casual player.

        But I’m pretty sure we both know Overwatch 2 isn’t the worst game available. (I’m not going to go out of my way defend OW2 to anyone, it’s not worth it.)