• dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      75
      ·
      7 months ago

      Assuming a salary of $200,000/year, this $56B bonus could pay the salaries of 280,000 employees.

      The actual layoff was around 14,000 employees. Assuming the same $200k salary, he could have asked for a bonus of $53B instead of $56B and paid for them.

    • whoisearth@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      They should ship him back to SA so they can put a tyre around his head and light it.

  • reddig33@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    111
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Tesla should seek to oust Elon from the company. He’s ruining it. Cybertruck, falling sales, and important people heading for the exits.

    • Sludgehammer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      56
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      7 months ago

      Tesla should seek to oust Elon from the company.

      They can’t. The only thing propping up the ludicrous stock price is the myth of “Elon Musk, Super genius” and the legions of Musk fanboys. If they kick Musk out they lose both and the stock will tank. So they’ve got to keep him in place, even as he runs the company into the ground.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          25
          ·
          7 months ago

          It’s not. He even has defenders on Lemmy. Say that he has no experience as an engineer when it comes to cars and rockets and they come crawling out of the woodwork with quotes from people who worship him saying he’s totally an engineering genius.

        • GooseFinger@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          25
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          I have a handful of tankie capitalism and “democracy” loving, American “traditional” leaning and religious Republican coworkers who absolutely still believe that he’s a genius. They feel that way about other billionaires too.

          Edit: TIL that “tankie” doesn’t mean “capitalism and ‘democracy’ loving, American ‘traditional’ leaning and religious Republicans.” I guess the shorthand for that is just “stereotypical conservative.”

            • Omgboom
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              deleted by creator

          • dubyakay@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            tankie

            I think you were looking for the word “ancap” instead.

          • Wrench@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            Are your tankie friends buying tesla vehicles?

            Edit - real question. I have doubts his neo nazi/ libertarian followers are buying EVs because they seem to actively want to harm the environment as much as possible.

            I’m genuinely curious what the tankie demographic is like. I could see them as off the grid solar/battery doomsday prepper types.

          • reddig33@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            That’s lovely, but conservatives aren’t the market for solar panels and electric cars.

          • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            7 months ago

            Stock value can take a very long time to adjust. Once consumers and institutions buy a stock, they can’t sell it easily. It’s either a loss to sell it if they bought at a peak so they wait it out or if it’s up and they want out, selling needs to be spread out to limit capital gains tax. If it’s an institution with a large holding, it will cause the stock to drop before they’re out.

            • Bloodyhog@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              Mostly agree, but. As far as I understand it, for TSLA the majority of the bull run is due to relatively small investors riding the hype. Big stakes are indeed rare to change hands, and mostly outside the marketplaces. Should the small guys really change their mind on the stocks, they (or at least the first wave) will easily dump it, and that will move the market by a lot. We can probably see it in YTD results, but still there is no dumping, in my opinion. Just a correction, so far.
              Personally would not buy now, though )

      • Clent@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        7 months ago

        They also won’t because they are hand selected by Musk. 2 out of 3 board members share his last name.

        The other is the alleged director of the board after Musk was forced to vacate the position. All indications are that she is his puppet.

      • The Pantser@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        That’s what they said about apple too and they have done pretty well without Jobs, although their quality and vision have suffered.

        • Clent@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          Far different scenario since Apple didn’t have much choice and Jobs left them with a product pipeline that wasn’t garbage

    • Neuromancer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      43
      ·
      7 months ago

      Ousting him would be hard. He owns a significant amount of stock. I like the cybetruck

      That said they need to talk him into a less visible role. Hire a real cto and put him in charge of secret projects

      The board is all his buddies. That will prevent any real change.

    • tb_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      7 months ago

      $56 billion could pay 56 thousand workers $100k per year for ten years straight.

      Instead they laid of thousands of workers not making anywhere near that sum.

      Yet this one man deserves all that “value” he personally surely generated.

      • Masamune@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 months ago

        Ah, I see you have studied and understand the complexities of corporate finance. Well done, let’s give our CEO a 2,000% raise to celebrate!

        -Corporate board somewhere, probably

  • SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    73
    ·
    7 months ago

    there was nothing he hated more, “but it must be done”.

    sure. he’s in agony. pure pain. insurmountable suffering

    Maybe the board can buy him out of the company at some point. It might actually safe the company without him at the top

  • mipadaitu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    How many employees could still have their jobs if that pay package was reserved for salaries instead of bonuses to this guy who spends all day, every day, fucking around with a completely different company he’s running into the ground.

  • GrymEdm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    This news is frustrating:

    • I am put off by the judge ruling against it because “it’s unfair to shareholders”. It’s unfair to a lot of people, especially in the wake of layoffs. If the law does not protect the basic necessities for working Americans, then the law needs changing.
    • How many of Elon’s workers could get paid a living wage for that $56bn? If he passed it up could he stop trying to oppose unions and make some life-changing concessions for his employees?
    • Even putting that aside, how is that money going to change Elon’s life? As in the daily experience of what he eats, vacation opportunities, housing, etc? Because money is kind of like water - it’s incredibly important if you don’t have enough, but once you have more than you could use the only reason to keep hoarding it is restricting others’ access for pride, greed, or leverage (i.e. purchasing influence).

    I’m not even as far left of center as I probably sound. I believe that different economic classes should exist or people aren’t motivated - you need to pay surgeons well in order to get enough surgeons. However, “the floor” should be raised to ensure housing/food/utilities security at the cost of “the ceiling” being lowered (or existing at all). Oxfam says a wealth tax of 5% on multi-millionaires/billionaires would solve world hunger in 10 years, lift 2 billion out of poverty, and much more. As of 2023 the bottom half of the USA, as in about 170ish million citizens, only have access to 3% of America’s wealth while the top 10% control just over 66% of wealth. Deals like this, coupled with the mass layoffs across multiple industries, is only making that obscene inequality worse.

    • Tja@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      7 months ago

      I don’t know how many employees Tesla has, but that literally could turn 56,000 employees into millionaires. Well, not literally, because taxes, but you get the idea.

      • GrymEdm@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        7 months ago

        Exactly, or put it in a fund collecting even low-level interest and give that many a raise of 50 grand/year for 20 years.

    • AlwaysNowNeverNotMe@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      7 months ago

      Raise the floor too high and suddenly nobody needs to sign up to be a murderer for hire to go to college. Suddenly people who actually know how the sector functions can create their own firms. Suddenly the idea of an industry being to big to fail and getting a bailout every decade isn’t as necessary. Suddenly your carefully protected tax shields aren’t quite so effective.

      • GrymEdm@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Edit: Holy crap, I need to confess I misread your post and replied as if you were making a completely different point. That is my mistake, full stop, and after re-reading your reply I can only assume I likely confused you and others.

        Any extreme is bad, that’s true. But there’s a lot of room in between current affairs and the situation you’re describing I should have read that more carefully. Many of the happiest, healthiest nations on Earth (prime example being Nordic nations) have a model featuring government intervention in the economy and strong social nets while still being capitalist.

        • Neuromancer@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          7 months ago

          And still being some form a republic/democracy.

          I’m a republican and I strongly believe if the people want and it’s constitutional, it’s fair game

          I also believe in regulations to avoid mega corps.

          I also support rules are publicly traded companies and wages.

          It’s been disappointing how many people, not politicians, have bought into we should let companies do anything they want.

    • dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      How many of Elon’s workers could get paid a living wage for that $56bn?

      There are 140,000 employees, so each one could get $400,000. That is WAY more than a liveable wage. He could give every single person in his company $200,000 and STILL have $28B leftover for his bonus. I can’t imagine what it would be like to have a billion, and I’m a pretty imaginative person who makes a lot of money. If someone said to me, “I can give you $56B, or I can give you $28B and 140,000 other people $200,000. You choose.” I would gladly give all of those 140,000 people handjobs by me personally along with that $200k. It might take awhile to give all those handjobs, but I’d commit to it for $28B.

      It would take 972 days of 12 hours per day giving 5 minute long handjobs. Roughly 3 years of indentured servitude to get $28B. Worth it.

    • dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      ·
      7 months ago

      A bonus that high needs to be taxed at 99%. That would leave $56M, which is more than 99.9% of the world will make in their entire lifetime.

      • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        49
        ·
        7 months ago

        1% of $56B is actually $560M. That’s how astronomically stupid this package is.

  • HarbingerOfTomb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    7 months ago

    I always thought that maybe if Musk was gone someday, it would be ok to like Tesla’s again… Fuck Tesla Forever.

  • hark@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    7 months ago

    He should be paying the company $56 billion in damages for the dumb cybertruck he pushed through.