• mozz@mbin.grits.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    182
    ·
    2 months ago

    The listed excerpts are actually quite tame compared to what the actual plan is.

    slashing U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) funding, dismantling the FBI and the Department of Homeland Security

    invoking the Insurrection Act of 1807 to deploy the military for domestic law enforcement and directing the DOJ to pursue Trump adversaries

    create a federally funded “American Academy” that would deliver online courses and grant free degrees that excluded “wokeness or jihadism”. The plan would also be funded by taxing the endowments of major universities

    every state report exactly how many abortions take place within its borders, at what gestational age of the child, for what reason, the mother’s state of residence, and by what method

    I stopped looking, not because there was any shortage of further crazy shit. There’s plenty more.

    • SturgiesYrFase@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      72
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Yeah, and there’s a fair amount of money behind this push…which like…I’m not American, don’t live in the States, but my sister and her wife do…and I’ve gotta figure out how to get them the fuck out if things go Trump again…

      Edit: also, living in the UK I run into loads of people who go “Well, if Trump gets in again, that’s not really our problem…” but like…the USA makes they’re problems everyone’s problem. And another Trump presidential term would be a huge problem for the rest of the world…

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        also, living in the UK

        Yeah, I’ve been following UK politics by way of TrashFuture podcast and I gotta say… your immigration plan is to deport people to Rwanda and your government just endorsed a Trans-Panic Committee to decide whether teenagers can consent to gender-affirming care.

        And these are the moderate Labour Party positions. Liz Truss wants to do worse.

        God damn, dude. Finding the worst people to run the country is not a competition. You can just let the Yanks have this one.

        • Asafum@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          2 months ago

          They look at our right wing propaganda machine to see what “works.” They also get the added “benefit” of our toxic sludge that is online political discourse to feed off of. They don’t need new issues as they have a repository of shit to pick from…

          Why does Americas #2 export need to be toxic right wing bullshit…

        • SturgiesYrFase@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Finding the worst people to run the country is not a competition.

          I’m only here on a marriage visa, I’m not a P.R or citizen yet, so I’m not allowed to vote against having these bigots and con-men in power. Also, while labour is somewhat moderate, the Tories are in power, and they’re a bunch of fucking nut jobs. Labour can’t decide what they stand for anymore, which means they will stand for nothing, and the rest of the available parties will never get to power again. The available options are shit, just like in the States. And the Yanks think they invented having a shit government, but lemme tell you, the Brits have been fucking up their own government and foreign governments for a lot longer the the US has been a thing.

          • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            As a yank who’s followed British politics for a while, I wouldn’t blame labour’s bullshit on the tories. They seem to have done the same thing in response to thatcher that the Dems did to Reagan “ok sure we can be the neutral centrist party, we’ll be conservative while you be regressive”. When I see actual left wing ideas coming out of the UK it’s either from your queer folks, a small and vulnerable actual left wing, or from the SNP. Even now with the tories wildly unpopular Labour seems to be taking the attitude of “we should reach across the aisle and offer to do what they propose”.

            But you are right we learned how to govern from two sources, you and the Iroquois confederacy, and the Iroquois functioned (they still do, but they did then too).

            • SturgiesYrFase@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              you and the Iroquois

              Yeah, I’m Canadian buddy.

              Edit: I’m not disagreeing with anything you said, just to tired to formulate a proper response, might come back to this tomorrow.

          • quaddo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            In a similar situation here in NZ. On a perm resident visa through partnership, can’t vote, keenly interested in being on my best behaviour here. Labour wasn’t amazeballs, but the current coalition is like watching a pack of dogs with diarrhoea tear through a quiet town. You just know it’ll be on someone else to clean up after them.

        • Carlo@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          The Rwanda asylum scheme is and has been a Tory plan from its inception, and has never been endorsed by Labour. I’m not familiar with the TrashFuture podcast, but can recommend Pod Save the UK if you’re in the market for UK politics pods.

          • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2024/04/24/labour-could-keep-sunaks-rwanda-policy-successful/

            Baroness Jenny Chapman, a frontbencher who was Sir Keir’s political secretary, was asked whether Labour would axe the scheme if 10,000 migrants had been flown to Rwanda by the time of the election.

            The peer, who was a member of the shadow cabinet, replied: “If it did, as a major major leap with a thought experiment, then we might be having a different conversation but there is absolutely no evidence this is going to work.”

            • Carlo@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 months ago

              Pretty big stretch to call that any kind of endorsement, don’t you think?

                • Carlo@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  It was explicitly a hypothetical thought experiment. Starmer has already said they wouldn’t go through with the Rwanda plan, even if it did somehow prove effective. That’s all stated plainly in the article you linked (from the Telegraph!). It really seems like you’re just doubling down in the face of the evidence, rather than admitting to having made an incorrect statement.

                  • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    It was explicitly a hypothetical thought experiment

                    By the presumed future minister in charge. If boat crossings to the UK fall following implementation of Rwanda deportations (more a gamble than a hypothetical) they’ll continue the program.

                    Starmer has already said they wouldn’t go through with the Rwanda plan

                    Starmer’s shadow cabinet - including Yvette Cooper, shadow home secretary - have simply asserted the program is “too expensive”. That’s their sole opposition to the new rule. Not that they won’t go through with it, but that they don’t want to pay for it.

      • thr0w4w4y2@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 months ago

        The UK gets whatever the US gets, it just sometimes lags by a few years depending on how long it takes for the US to excrete it over here.

    • Daft_ish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s a very ambitious list. The executive branch will be a smoldering wreck before they even get started. Let’s hope we get a 2028 election because 2032 and 2036 will be all about rebuilding.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 months ago

      create a federally funded “American Academy” that would deliver online courses and grant free degrees that excluded “wokeness or jihadism”.

      I gotta say, this is hilarious both in how it delivers lip service to a popular idea (free public higher education) and outright mangles the implementation so its guaranteed to fail (why the fuck would any serious employer value an anti-wokeness degree?)

      every state report exactly how many abortions take place within its borders

      Government small enough to fit in your vagina.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        The public: “We want free public higher education!”

        Fascists: “Okay, we’ll use tax money to shove PraegerU down everyone’s throat.”

        The public: “Wait, no, not like that!”

      • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        Also like I was radicalized in college without my courses including any of that shit. Nothing drove me to the labor left harder than having it drilled into be how I’ll need to explain human suffering in dollars in my ergonomics class. And like the teacher wasn’t wrong and he was very conservative.