• candybrie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 months ago

      Alcohol and tobacco are specifically not scheduled. They don’t even fall under the same regulatory agency. They get their own special one with firearms of all things.

        • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          Now imagine if cannabis seeds were floating through the air all the time, and also used to produce a staple food, and you’ll see how alcohol is even harder to regulate.

      • Rapidcreek@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        Most drugs on the schedule are not illegal, just controlled. In fact, we already do control alcohol with things like age limitations. Due to the destructive nature of the drug, is it so incredible to control it further?

        • whotookkarl@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          8 months ago

          Yes, prohibitions of addictive substances creates dangerous black markets and criminals out of addicts who usually need medical support not a judge or jail. We try to prevent children from driving, drinking, smoking, etc for the same reason we don’t send children to jail & that’s not a good way to legislate adult or general populations.

    • baldingpudenda@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      8 months ago

      I haven’t looked it up, but isn’t it a poison with no known medical use? That’s schedule 1. Right next to heroin.

    • Pulptastic@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      To what end? If we make alcohol more difficult to acquire, we are encouraging illegal markets as has been demonstrated. Making any drug illegal doesn’t work.