• NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Going solely off your username, no PSN in Poland? Not that anyone should be forced to make a new account for a game they’ve had for months regardless of where they are.

      • FluffyPotato@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        7 months ago

        It’s not available in any of the baltics countries either so wouldn’t be surprised if it’s not in Poland either.

  • Chozo@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    7 months ago

    What a dumb move, timing this with trying to convince people to buy the new warbond. Hopefully Sony reverses this decision after seeing how badly this damages the health of the game.

    Unfortunately for those requesting refunds, unless you’re in an area that’s soon to be excluded, you likely won’t get your money back. The game has had the requirement for the PSN account linking listed on the Steam page since day 1, so it’s unlikely that Valve will do much in this situation.

    Arrowhead isn’t free of guilt in this, but Sony and Valve should have both done a much better job at making this clear to players earlier on, since they’re in charge of marketing/sales on PC. Like, in-game messaging would have been good for this. They also should have never allowed the sale of the game on regions PSN isn’t available to in the first place, since they already knew they would killswitch non-linked accounts eventually.

    What a disappointing day for democracy.

    • GoodEye8@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      7 months ago

      Arrowhead isn’t free of guilt in this, but Sony and Valve should have both done a much better job at making this clear to players earlier on, since they’re in charge of marketing/sales on PC.

      Well they kinda did. When you first launched the game it did say that you need a PSN account to play. I know this because that’s when I learned PSN isn’t available in my country. But you were able to skip it and after skipping you never saw this notification again. Valve also has it on the store page “Requires 3rd-Party Account: PlayStation Network (Supports Linking to Steam Account)”, but nobody reads those little notices. I don’t blame anyone for missing that information, especially since not linking PSN accounts has not affected the game for months.

      And if you want a really fun fact. Web archive link because I imagine Sony is going to change it, but on the Playstation website they explicitly state “Signing in to PSN is optional when playing a PlayStation game on PC.”.

      I’m not going to to anything hasty. I hope Sony walks it back because I do enjoy the game, but if by June nothing has changed I will ask a refund from Valve because I’ll literally be unable to play the game, unless I go against PSN ToS. I have no problem getting on the FUCK SONY train once they’ve left me no other choice.

  • BrowseMan@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Was the account linking mentionned anywhere on steam?

    It’s really feels like a new condition sneaked in… Edit: apparently it was clearly stated on steam and on the first launch of the game. I really have bad skipping habits…

    The “it’s to protect players against hakerzzzzz” doesn’t feel very legit.

    • MrNesser@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      7 months ago

      This is absolutely a Sony push to get more data the game was released without the need of having a ps account

        • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          No they don’t?

          Helldivers 2 was produced with a Sony publishing deal, but unless I missed some news, Arrowhead is still independently owned.

        • copygirl@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          7 months ago

          If you make a PSN account you have to agree to their ToS, which probably lets them do more than a EULA does.

          It also boosts user numbers, which looks good on paper.

    • snekerpimp@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      How else are they going to make their subscription numbers look like they are going up when no one is buying PS5s?

    • BarbecueCowboy@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      7 months ago

      If you read the announcement, it’s obviously a very carefully worded prepared statement from Sony that they’ve been given and ordered to pass out. The hackers reasoning is made up and just the best excuse they could come up with, Sony wants more data in their environment and they’re being forced to comply.

    • jet@hackertalks.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      I’ve left a negative review on the page. And I’ve requested a refund from steam.

      I doubt steam will grant the refund, I’m at 275 hours. But I’m trying…

      [update] refund denied. “We will not be granting a refund at this time.”

      • redfellow@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        7 months ago

        Kind of weird seeing as they stated this requirement before release and you also agreed to it. Doesn’t seem like your refund has ground to stand on.

        That said, I didn’t realize it either, but I’m not blaming my mistake on the storefront or devs.

        • jet@hackertalks.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          It may have been in the fine print. I’ll grant you that. But the de facto experience did not require a account with PlayStation.

          I have on occasion accidentally bought an EA game, only to launch it to see that it requires an EA account, and then to refund it.

          I don’t have an issue with somebody creating a game that requires a PlayStation account, that’s their business more power to them. Changing the requirements after the refund window has finished is what I have issue with. And I agree with you I don’t expect them to give me a refund, but I’m going to god damn well ask.

          But let’s put it this way, I played a game, but I did not create a Sony account. Now the game is being taken away from me unless I agree to Sony’s terms and conditions. If I don’t agree if those conditions the game doesn’t work. That’s refundable

          Not to mention a good middle ground would be you can’t do steam to Sony cross play unless you have a Sony account. Fair enough

          • redfellow@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            7 months ago

            Alternative take: they didn’t change the terms, they started enforcing the terms we already agreed to.

            I’m gonna make an account anyway, for me the bigger issue was the exclusivity, I boycott Sony due that, and won’t be buying any of the FF games, but I decided to make an exception for HD2, for better or worse.

            • jet@hackertalks.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              7 months ago

              Changing how the game is experienced is changing the de facto terms. But sure I agree with you it’s better that the title is not exclusive.

    • ditty@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Ironically, a feature I wish DRG would add is linking PSN accounts with Steam accounts, and save importing/exporting. I played 300hrs of DRG on PS5 since it was 'free" on PS+. Now I’ve switched to PC so I can play with mods but I’m back at square one with a new save.

  • tiberius@lemmy.caM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Please inform any inactive / retired Helldivers to ask for a refund if their country does not support a PS account as they should not have been able to play the game in the first place.

    I am unable to verify which countries are affected.

  • ramble81@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    7 months ago

    I don’t own a PlayStation and by extension don’t have an account. So I have to sign up for a service I have no desire for to play?

  • SmoochyPit@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    How kind of them to remind us that a live-service game is still a live-service game, and that arrowhead is still owned by a for-profit corporation.

    I still plan to play, though. Wasn’t account linking already required for crossplay, or was that a separate thing?

    • Tikiporch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      7 months ago

      Are there so many non profit organizations in game development and publishing that a reminder was required?

      • SmoochyPit@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        If you take a look at its reception, the community definitely treats it like a major departure from other live service game practices. I’d tend to agree— the price, micro transactions, content and quality all seem very fair compared to other live service games in the space.

    • Evotech@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      7 months ago

      It was expressed that this was required the whole time to be fair, it just want the case

      • ThrowawayOnLemmy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        See and that’s where they lose me. If it was truly a requirement, why disable it at all? If it’s a requirement now, why could I play before without it? I get the game had network issues when it launched so they disabled the PSN requirements at that time. They could have resolved those network issues without disabling the PSN linking. Convenient that they also sold this game in regions where PSN isn’t available and now those people are just SOL.

        I know legally they’re covered, because they have disclosures on the store page and at the start of the game. I don’t care. Fuck their disclosures. This was a stupid way to handle it. They can have their legal victory, they lost a player anyways.

        All they had to do is make PSN linking optional and this wouldn’t be an issue for the vast majority of people that don’t exactly trust Sony with their data. Not like they’ve had a repeated history of hacks and leaks of PSN customer data.