• Zuzak [fae/faer, she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    ·
    6 months ago

    If someone doesn’t care enough for their baby to feed it, they would simply sell their baby on the baby market to somebody with a use for it. Checkmate commies ancap-good

      • Zuzak [fae/faer, she/her]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        43
        ·
        6 months ago

        Murray Rothbard, yes. The guy who coined the term, “anarcho-capitalism.”

        “the purely free society will have a flourishing free market in children”.

        “the existence of a free baby market will bring such ‘neglect’ down to a minimum”

        • BountifulEggnog [she/her]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          24
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          I would be very interested to know why they think that would be any better then our current adoption system. You can already give up an infant, and there’s a wait list a mile long. What’s going to make abusive parents suddenly realize “you know what, I should give up my baby”. Because I’ve known a lot of uh, not great parents who just continue to have them.

          To everyone’s surprise, abusive pieces of shit don’t really care about their victims.

          • dementor333 [she/her]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            23
            ·
            6 months ago

            Yeah but they’d care about money, and I assume the idea here is that they literally sell the babies to people who want them. With no restrictions or necessary background checks. I see no way this could possibly backfire and turn into some kind of dystopian hellscape, after all, when has that ever happened under Capitalism? \s

          • PKMKII [none/use name]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            6 months ago

            Real world consequences are irrelevant for libertarians, all that matters is that they come up with some answer that satisfies their absurd logic game constructs. The walking embodiments of “the means justify the ends.”

          • CloutAtlas [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            30
            ·
            6 months ago

            So is charisma and wisdom. They pump it all into luck. If they succeed due to luck, they create more libertarians saying the system works better the way they did it. If they don’t succeed, well, they die poor and alone but won’t be famous enough to dissuade future libertarians

    • ProletarianDictator [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      ·
      6 months ago

      The dead ones are probably the lucky ones in this situation.

      If they believe parental neglect of children should be permitted, then there would be orders of magnitude more children who end up malnourished, developmentally stunted, and abused, but not to the point of dying 🎉

      You’d see twice as many instances of chained up 17 year olds who have seen the sun twice and eaten nothing besides dry store brand corn flakes their entire life. Or sold to their local libertarian warlord or meth dealer.

      Even the ones that manage to become an independent adult will have severe traumas and extreme difficulties integrating into society. How big is the problem where the state takes a child away that shouldn’t have been? Just another right wing weirdo who sees children as property of their parents.

  • Fishroot [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Even capitalists would tell you that Kids are not disposable because they are “a long term investment “ hence why you have to invest in their education for the betterment of the machine.

    Lolbertarians are just final stage debate pervs and have the stupidest takes because they are brave rnough to look unhinged in public

  • GrouchyGrouse [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    6 months ago

    Me, Satan, introducing my 2 friends at the party under a chandelier of baby skulls: “Unbridled Personal Freedom, meet Fascism.” My two hands grab each other and pretend to handshake.

  • nohaybanda [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    6 months ago

    Heads so empty it’s like Capitalist Zen. Freed from all the rationalisations and lies. They can channel the true essence of Capitalism - nothing but pure pitiless void

  • loathsome dongeater@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    6 months ago

    So they have finally started fantasizing about controverted scenarios where they can justify killing babies. I wonder what comes next.

    • context [fae/faer, fae/faer]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      6 months ago

      the-more-you-know today i learned:

      The Dark Harvest Commando of the Scottish Citizen Army (DHC) was a militant group which in 1981 demanded that the British government decontaminate Gruinard Island, a site which had been used for anthrax weapon testing during World War II. They distributed on the mainland potentially anthrax-laden soil.[1][2]

      The group identified itself as “Dark Harvest Commando” and claimed to include a “team of microbiologists from two universities” in Scotland. In a message to the Glasgow Herald, the group said they had landed on the island with the aid of local people and removed 300 lb (140 kg) of soil contaminated with anthrax spores, to be placed around the UK.[3][4]

      The group placed a container of soil outside the Chemical Defence Establishment at Porton Down in Wiltshire.[5] Five days later, a second container of soil was placed at Blackpool, a resort town where the Conservative Party was holding a conference presided over by margaret-thatcher .[4] The first container was found to contain Bacillus anthracis (the causative agent of anthrax), while the second was uncontaminated but of the same soil type as found on the island.[6] At the end of the year, the group announced they would take no further action through a message pinned to the doors of the Scottish Office in Edinburgh.[4] Gruinard Island was eventually decontaminated in 1986.[4]

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_Harvest_Commando