Chinese police hunting international corruption targets were allowed into Australia by the federal police and subsequently escorted a woman back to China for trial, in a major breach of Chinese-Australian police protocols.

The revelations, contained in Monday night’s Four Corners program about a former Chinese spy, prompted a sharp rebuke from federal politicians who are concerned the act may have undermined Australia’s national security.

The Chinese police were permitted to enter Australia in 2019 to talk with a 59-year-old Chinese-born Australian resident.

The woman was targeted under a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) anti-corruption drive called Operation Fox Hunt, which relies on police from the Ministry of Public Security (MPS) to make arrests.

Her case is one of 283 cases documented by an international NGO, Safeguard Defenders, in its recent report, Chasing Fox Hunt.

While Fox Hunt is described by the CCP as targeting “economic criminals”, human rights groups have said it is also used to silence dissidents and abduct people around the world.

    • Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      It’s far from the truth to assume there’s one cohesive government entity that collaborates and communicates well enough to do something like this, and to assume not a single person associated has decided to be a whistle blower.

      Edit: a word

      • stevedidwhat_infosec@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        32
        ·
        6 months ago

        Not the same commenter but still, nevertheless, interested in the convo ofc

        It may not be an explicit government, but that’s why I specifically said in my retort “the world runs on money”.

          • RogueBanana
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            They are talking about you. Their first reply was to someone else but the second was for you.

              • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                12
                ·
                edit-2
                6 months ago

                And yet extremely easy to understand especially when you’re the one who butted in randomly

                • stephen01king
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  Is joining a comment section considered butting in randomly? What is the point of Lemmy if joining a comment thread is viewed negatively?

          • stevedidwhat_infosec@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            23
            ·
            6 months ago

            … so either you’re on alts or have such a lack of self awareness that you don’t even recognize what you did.

            Either way I think we’re done here lol

        • unreasonabro@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          the level of reading comprehension, the number of assumptions kids make these days - its fucking horrifying, innit

          • stevedidwhat_infosec@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            Not at all, some concepts are harder for some. Some grow up in environments that make learning ugly, alienating, etc. I do want to ask - would you catch flies better with vinegar or with honey? Or are you more interested in squashing?