They are probably being paid by copyright holders
I doubt it.
The copyright holders can just sue and lobby Congress
Yeah but they might be able to get it shut down quicker and cheaper through less legal means
It would just come backup. Ddos attacks are temporary
I think IA is already overloaded as-is. I know it’s hard to keep that insane amount of storage available but it’s still always slow. They probably only have one server location, as opposed to a global CDN like YouTube.
I think the slowness is partly by design.
Their goal is to make everything available, not necessarily available quickly; people going to an archive are generally looking for something in particular so a bit of latency doesn’t really affect the majority of valid use cases. They’re not hosting a CDN and they want to discourage people from treating it as such. It also puts off scrapers as I imagine the rate at which you could scrape is slower than the rate at which content is added to the archive
I know. I’m not saying I need it any faster and most people in fact don’t, but as they have no incentive to widen their bandwidth, we can expect outages if they ever make some lawless group angry.
They have several but the main one on the Western hemisphere is an old church in SF.
I think library of Alexandria in Egypt is another location?
Wait… Alexandria… Now Internet Archive is literal Internet Library of Alexandria.
I would bet good money the attack is backed by people who want their old content offline, but dont want to been viewed in public as the bad guys.
I’m more cynical, I think it’s just for clout and marketing. IA is widely known and used, so an attack is guaranteed to be noticed and generate news articles. They’re also known for having large robust infrastructure, but they aren’t large enough that an attack is impossible, so a successful attack is impressive yet still feasible. If someone can pull it off, it would make great marketing for their black market DDOS service and also grant huge bragging rights in certain communities.
I’m not sure why you are getting down voted. This is the conclusion I came to as well.
IA is one of those rare organizations that have an incredible online reach and notoriety but aren’t backed by a trillion dollar corporation. Taking them down is easier compared to other sites with the same amounts of traffic, while still providing a lot of publicity. Another example would be Wikipedia, however most of their content is plain HTML and easily cacheable too. The IA has a lot of heavy media; videos, old software, photo’s, etc not even mentioning the ability search over all those millions of pieces of content. It seems like a prime target for this kind of pubilicty stunt.
“Let’s vandalize our local library”
some fuckheads are actually doing this to the SPL.
The IQ of a mob is it’s dumbest member divided by the number of people in the mob. I think that Terry Pratchett stole that line.
It’s worse when the people in the mob don’t have to leave the basement
Chances are this is a professional group with a botnet composed of potentially millions of computers
…and their idea of a good time is to attack the National Archives
*Internet Archives
And I was hoping for a Nic Cage cameo!
Real not very fun answer: China or Russia.
Control of information is the real power.
Look at every dictatorship. Look at extremism. Look at wife beaters ffs. If someone is trying to DDOS the Internet Archive then someone is trying to mess with the free flow of information.
I doubt it. If someone wanted to do real harm they would launch a more traditional attack
DDoS is the most traditional brute force attack you can hit a website with.
Setting fire to the servers is trickier.
They could target an employee in a phishing email or leave USB drives on the doorstep
Again, a lot more work than a ddos
Why is it a subway sandwich?
Why wouldn’t it be a sandwich? Sounds like you have been reading to much pro burrito propaganda.
That’s not a sandwich, it’s a sub. A sandwich is made from sliced bread, not from a bun. That’s why a sausage sanga is a sandwich but a hot dog isn’t. Hot dog has a bun, disqualifying it.
That’s not a sub, that’s an underground metropolitan transportation system. A sub is a little train that goes in tunnels under the city.
that’s not a sub, that’s a submissive person in a sexual context
That’s not a sub, that’s a person who teaches the class when your regular teacher is absent. A sub is a long metal tube that’s underwater and full of seamen.
the other sub might also be full of se(a)men
Someone please correct Ben’s BBQ. I don’t even want to think about pulled pork sandwiches.
Did you know a bun is sliced bread?
A sub is a sandwich. Any starchy food with things inside is a sandwich.
TIL tortellini is a sandwich.
Yes. It’s a wet sandwich. Like a bao, but boiled instead of steamed.
Wait a minute, a calzone is a pizzussy, not a sandwich surely? Scientists worldwide would be baffled by this revelation
You’re saying nachos are a pile of sandwiches?
There’s bad actors all of kinds.
install the archive warrior if you have spare server space and help them out
Ive half been waiting for a headline from Internet Archive
“Its not a DDoS its actually a bunch of webscrapers collecting non-paywalled articles for AI”
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
Dude to me has always been gender neutral
Same here
Eta: before capitalizing The Dude and putting quotes around “fucking A”, my search yielded results WILDLY different than the one I was looking for.
In retrospect, I should have taken DDG’s refusal to show any results with safe search on moderate rather than off as a clue 😆
get another joke
I bet you think you’re real clever…
What was the original comment?
Judging by the other replies, something about “dude” being a gendered term. Which it most often isn’t used as.
It is the term from the meme which originally was dudes discussing Subway.
One of those “Did you just assume my gender???” ‘jokes’ that are soooo original and funny
Get off the cross, we need the wood
Or stay on and die already
Ok then
I think that comment said something along the lines of;
Did you seriously just assume the gender of the DDOSers?!?
