Five House Democrats led by Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York wrote to the US attorney general, Merrick Garland, to demand a federal investigation of the conservative supreme court justice Clarence Thomas, over his acceptance of undeclared gifts from billionaire rightwing donors.

“We write to urge the Department of Justice to launch an investigation into … Clarence Thomas for consistently failing to report significant gifts he received from Harlan Crow and other billionaires for nearly two decades in defiance of his duty under federal law,” the Democrats said.

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    99
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    It’s always disappointing when people shit on the few politicians who are actually trying to help because there’s not enough of them to win…

    AOC is out there bringing this stuff up and motivating younger generations to get involved in politics, and it’s working.

    So it’s really hard to believe all the people who claim to be on the left but spend all their time shitting on the ones trying and not the ones who won’t even talk about it.

    • bitsplease@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      48
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      I’ll really never understand why so many people reserve so much hate specifically for AOC. Is she perfect? Is she immune from the hypocrisy you find in literally every elected official today? Hell no. She’s definitely guilty of having said one thing than voted the other way and similar, as is every other politician out there.

      But on the relative scale of U.S. Politicians, she’s one of the few who is at least making the right noises about change, and while she doesn’t always get things done, she definitely seems to be moving in a better direction than most other politicians.

      And yet people single her out all the time for their hatred. Between her and the hate surrounding Greta (which is also weirdly prevalent on Lemmy), it’s hard to see it as anything more than just hating young women who speak up, and wind up being wildly successful at doing so

      • Dubious_Fart@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        51
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        People hate her cause shes

        1. A woman
        2. Not afraid to point out bullshit
        3. Puerto Rican.
        4. A democrat.
      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        And yet people single her out all the time for their hatred. Between her and the hate surrounding Greta (which is also weirdly prevalent on Lemmy), it’s hard to see it as anything more than just hating young women who speak up, and wind up being wildly successful at doing so

        I feel like there’s a lot of accounts on Lemmy that are larping so people believe the bullshit horseshoe theory is real.

        It’s the only rational explanation for lemmygrad and similar instances.

        • bitsplease@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          11 months ago

          It’s the only rational explanation for lemmygrad and similar instances.

          Idk, I explain that one away simply with the fact that stupidity and a desire to troll don’t strictly follow party lines. Nothings stopping a communist (or someone dumb enough to think being pro russia/China is the same thing) from having the mental maturity of your average the_donald poster

      • sarcasticsunrise@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        “Leftist” Jimmy Dore can take the blame for a good chunk of that. Ever since she snubbed him about a year ago all that dude does is hyper fixate on AOC. It’s legit disturbing

  • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    81
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    We write to urge the Department of Justice

    When the Department of Justice doesn’t do anything, what then?

    • Ubermeisters
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      11 months ago

      They can request a hearing in front of the House Judiciary Committee or the Senate Judiciary Committee to discuss the matter, or they can attempt to introduce new legislation which creates an independent committee to investigate.

      • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        11 months ago

        I don’t think the Senate has authority over the Court. That’s purely in the purview of the House, which is controlled by the fascist party and so requests and letters are a dead end. It’s gotta be something more aggressive than that.

        • xtr0n@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          If only the Democrats had the will to expand the house with a simple majority, back when they had the majority. Given how many people there are in left leaning states and cities, it’s absurd that the current GOP should ever be able to take the house. But, as usual , the only party that isn’t completely fascist seem incapable (or unwilling) to do what it takes to secure any power for the people they supposedly represent. We needed to expand the house and expand the Supreme Court ages ago.

    • eestileib@sh.itjust.works
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Merrick Garland’s cowardly ass would probably suppress any attempt to investigate Thomas. He wants back to those cushy FedSoc retreats.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        If the entire Dem party was as proactive as AOC something might happen, but they’re not.

        So until progressives are in power of the party, they can’t really do anything except “perform” and raise awareness.

        Why do you seem to blame the people who are trying instead of the ones who won’t even do that?

          • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            House reps make like 175k to maintain a primary residence (for her NYC) and one in DC…

            She’s not broke, but she’s not crazy rich either.

            And I’m confused, if she was rich, why would her pushing for wealth equality be bad?

            • TrismegistusMx@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              16
              ·
              11 months ago

              It’s not bad, it’s performative. It’s an act, like Nancy Pelosi kneeling with an African scarf. Meaningless, ineffective action that prevents effective and meaningful action.

        • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          19
          ·
          11 months ago

          And what is the plan to put progressives into power? Beg people to vote? The same failed strategy of my entire fucking life?

          AOC has a platform. There are millions of people who are ready to march on her command. She could use that instead of writing letters.

          • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            AOC has a platform. There are millions of people who are ready to march on her command. She could use that instead of writing letters.

            It sounds like you’re saying she should pull a trump?

            Or you greatly overestimate how much a peaceful protest would change the minds of Clearance Thomas or the “moderates” running the Dem party…

            I mean, she’s literally using her platform right now

            • xtr0n@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              11 months ago

              Calling for , encouraging and even organizing a peaceful protest isn’t “pulling a Trump “. Encouraging people to physically harm others to prevent vote counting and the peaceful transfer of power is what Trump did. Please don’t conflate legitimate protests with insurrection and attempted coups.

            • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              16
              ·
              11 months ago

              She’s not calling for protest. She’s not calling on her supporters to rise up and target McCarthy or Thomas. That’s what she should be doing.

              Do everything she can to stress for nonviolent resistance, of course, but our greatest enemies are just men. They have addresses, friends and family, business interests, investments, properties, vocal and financial supporters, and many other targets that are very vulnerable to collective action. I certainly don’t want overenthusiastic people with guns to storm the Capital or anything like that!

              • Alteon@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                12
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                It’s frustrating when you see someone doing a fantastic job of pushing the party further to the left, and doing everything they can to be a voice of reason and logic when there seems to be so little and then seeing someone like you going, “They aren’t doing enough.” Mate, what are YOU doing?

                • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  16
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  I’m a stupid worthless loser, what the fuck can I do besides whine on the internet?

                  She hasn’t pushed the Party anywhere. The voters did that! She just obeys.

              • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                11 months ago

                On a completely unrelated note:

                Anyone else have recommendations for an instance that doesn’t federate with lemmygrad or lemmy.ml?

                This shit is getting old

            • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              15
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              If she went on live television and called for mass protest, she could get millions of people to act in cities all across the country.

              Maybe it wouldn’t be millions right away, but so many people are just waiting for the Call to Action from their leaders.

              • xtr0n@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                11 months ago

                I don’t know if the progressives within the DNC could really mobilize a multi million person protest but if they could organize a general strike then that would get shit done. I’ve heard that if about 10% of workers strike then that has enough impact on the investor class to actually have leverage. Of course, the US isn’t France and the average person has no union, no savings and no access to a social safety net, so I’m not holding my breath.

  • Dubious_Fart@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    68
    ·
    11 months ago

    Do an investigation into the entire supreme court.

    I don’t care if they are left or right, lib or Con. Investigate them all.

    in fact there should be a special government agency dedicated to monitoring and constantly investigating Federal/Supreme court judges in the interests if ethics and impartiality.

    • ThePac@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      It seems so obvious. She’s what Democrats have been asking for in recent years. Would I prefer she have a bit more experience in Congress before making that move? Yes, but it can’t possibly be worse than what we got in 2016.

  • Egon [they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Neat! Maybe they’ll set down a commission to create a committee to create a framework for an investigation one of these days

  • AntiOutsideAktion [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    Congress has the power to legislate how the supreme court works.

    She could at least be doing a meaningless gesture that gestures towards something that could be useful.

  • Jordan Lund@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Nothing will come of it. The only guardrail on the Supreme Court is impeachment and the Republican led House will not start impeachment hearings on a Republican Judge.

    Want to change that? Here’s what needs to happen in 2024:

    A Democratic President
    A Democratic majority in the House
    At LEAST a 60 vote Democratic majority in the Senate.

      • Jordan Lund@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        We aren’t talking about Democratic leadership, we’re talking about AOC.

        p.s. “Democrat Party” gives your bias away, it’s the Democratic Party.

          • Jordan Lund@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            No it’s a “I’m not letting you be a sea lion and hijack the conversation.”

            If you have something on point to say, great. If you don’t? Exit’s over there…

              • came_apart_at_Kmart [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                14
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                did you not see that he is in charge of internet conversations and is using his legal authority to quash this entire line of inquiry?

                our only recourse is to wait for the next election and vote out his Pedantic Liberal Party in favor of a nebulous alternative and hope their platform includes a plank to revisit this issue at a later date.

        • SweaterWeather [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          So if the Democratic party leadership won’t commit to impeachment how is voting for them going to change the status quo of not impeaching judges?

          You said if you want to change this, you need this many Democrats. But the Democrats aren’t saying they’re going to change it. And presumably they know more about their intentions than you.

          Also you need 2/3 majority to convict. So you might want to revise your numbers.

          Edited to fix a typo

        • macabrett@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          10 months ago

          p.s. “Democrat Party” gives your bias away, it’s the Democratic Party.

          Is the bias that they’re a communist or an anarchist? Because that’s what most people on our instance are. It’s not like we’re hiding it.

  • Wage_slave@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    You know, in these hard, and trying time, it is heart warming to see AOC bringing those who demanded the rule of law, but didn’t have any. They have been starving for more rule and more law for so long now.

    God bless that woman. May they get so much rule of law that they cups over floweth and they can choke on it. There is so much rule of law in her generosity that it is reported that Chuck Norris gives thanks for her before every meal and self gratification.

    As well all should. And Moses said “Fuck yeah, you go girl”, and ye, it was good.

  • somename [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    Performative gestures continue to be performative. The Democratic Party has no real desire to check the power and corruption of the courts.

    • DauntingFlamingo@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      They do if Gerrymandering and voter suppression makes it so they have no power. They’re fine sharing power, but if they see a possibility of having none, they will fight back

  • duderium [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    11 months ago

    Would anyone who is not rich really care if every government official in the country (including Trump) was thrown in prison?

    • DauntingFlamingo@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      There are good ones doing their jobs. We only hear about the shitty ones, or the more protected ones who can afford to make noise due to being in deeply safe districts. AOC, Dick Durbin, Chuck Schumer, etc are all easy incumbents who won’t lose an election by making big plays that may or may not work out

      • duderium [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        10 months ago

        There are good ones doing their jobs.

        I mean, all of them have the same job: stop communism, keep the white supremacist bourgeois gravy train rolling. In that respect, they’re all more or less doing the best they can.

    • Astroturfed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      If you think this man would ever agree to resign, you haven’t been paying attention. He has to be impeached or he’ll probably die on the bench. This republican ghouls (and anyone involved in American politics in general (have you seen or heard Feinstein lately?)) are so addicted to the money and power they just never retire. Look at this walking corpse that has her family fighting over the inheritance already that’s a US senator:

        • Astroturfed@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Except there’s basically no way to do that… Kinda the whole issue. So, not sure wtf your really bad point is.

  • Skotimusj@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    11 months ago

    I love AOC, but this is just smoke and mirrors. The progressive reps always make a big deal when they know their “inquiries” will go nowhere because they don’t have the votes. It stirs up their base with no repercussions. This is just lip service at this point. Still glad it is being said though.

    • DauntingFlamingo@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      They’re the only ones saying anything or attempting anything official. They know they can’t remove him without the other chamber, but it is important to have these things on the official record for both the public and for a future session of Congress who could do something with it

    • Boddhisatva@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      It isn’t smoke and mirrors. They are making as big a deal out of it as they can because they don’t have the votes to do more. Calling attention to this criminal behavior is simply the best they can do because they, as you point out, don’t have the votes to do more. And stirring up their base if a good thing if it gets more progressive voters to the polls and gets more progressive representation in government.

    • Psythik@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Yeah seriously. AOC calls for a lot of things but no one will listen to her. The only thing she accomplishes is pissing off Republicans – which I’m all for – but nothing will get done with just one AOC. We need more people like her in office.