• Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    138
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    I have an in-law that’s a teacher, and she says it’s fucking crazy how radicalized some kids are. Her coworkers have dealt with 11 year old boys straight up telling female teachers they don’t have to listen to them because they’re women.

    They’re apparently always talking about shithead influencers like Andrew Tate too, and the ones that aren’t down the pipeline are definitely still heavily exposed to the ideas. Real disturbing shit.

      • Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        58
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        I’m hoping that it’s just the gen z/alpha version of an edgy atheist phase that they outgrow. For what it’s worth she also says a lot of kids are way more chill about LGBT students, including being respectful of pronouns.

        • Drusas@kbin.run
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          31
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          My experience with teenage atheists is that they usually remain atheists into adulthood.

            • Vittelius@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              4 days ago

              But if they are edgy misogynists in their teens and then they outgrow the edgy part…

              … Then we’ll still have a bunch of misogynists on our hand, but now their beliefs are sincere rather than performative.

            • Drusas@kbin.run
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              17
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              4 days ago

              I think you might have picked the wrong topic, then. Atheism tends to be sincere and not just edgy.

                • Maalus@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  22
                  ·
                  4 days ago

                  Ah so you have a black friend so it’s fine.

                  Atheism isn’t edgy, it is a lack of belief. If you mean anticlericalism, then that’s an entirely different thing.

                  • Honytawk
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    4 days ago

                    Atheism isn’t edgy, no.

                    But it can be, and that is what the whole discussion is about.

          • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            Really hard to take a niche religious belief seriously without a large dedicated community of fellow practitioners.

            Like, if you’re not regularly going to a church, there’s no peer network or social reproduction. You might become “spiritual”, but it’s going to be some religion you invented in your own head that’s divorced from any other formal setting. As likely as a non-athletic teenager suddenly becoming a baseball professional.

            Organized religion is as much about the organization as the religion.

        • rockerface@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          At least for atheism there’s a non-edgy, civilized version. For whatever this is, I don’t think you can make it more palatable without just throwing out the entire mindset

          • Zink@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            4 days ago

            It’s probably not an uncommon thing for us adult atheists to have been curious children and edgy teenagers.

        • blazeknave@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          4 days ago

          Yeah but reminds me of 21 jump street (film). Asshole bullies will just use “why you hate my gay friend?” as the new excuse to pick a fight.

      • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Nah, some of have been calling out right wing propaganda and the impact it’s having on the political scene for a while now. And it’s not just teens. Right wing propaganda has infested the left as well, to the point where you still have people repeating confirmed propaganda from the 2016 election because they’ve internalized it and can’t let it go.

        It’s not that the left has bad messaging or unpopular ideas, it’s that there are a ton of cynics under the big tent. Cynics who actively poison outreach efforts because they are intellectually lazy, but love their own farts.

        • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          It’s not that the left has bad messaging or unpopular ideas

          Good ideas, but terrible messaging. For example, imagine you wanted to sell Appalachia on the idea that the coal market is in decline so we should look at expanding other market sectors in the region so the entire region doesn’t increasingly resemble dead mine towns as time goes on. What’s the single worst possible way you could try to express that idea to those people?

          “I’m going to put a lot of coal companies and coal miners out of business” - Hillary Clinton, 2016.

            • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              3 days ago

              As far as the US goes, Democrats are basically the best you get that has any chance of winning an election and she was their choice for 2016. I even held my nose and voted for her in the general (but not in the primary).

              I won’t argue that progressives and the like shouldn’t be trying to either drag the party leftward or organize at a scale that they can actually win elections at some levels without needing the name Democrat behind them.

      • nomous@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        They have, they’re just now waking up and realizing there are actual stakes involved and thr right has a 50 year headstart.

        • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          The way I see it, the left had a good go and had the right on the ropes and lost it in the last 15 - 20 years. Not 50.

          I saw a systematic push to pretty much remove the left from the internet and weight the algorithms towards right wing issues while vilifying the left as pompous know it all’s and out of touch with the regular man. Which is crazy because 15 years ago most people would have agreed with so many of the values that are vilified today.

          Canadian sub reddits is a perfect example. One day accounts started showing up and laying into anyone looking to do discuss politics. And then hammered them over and over. Then a new sub showed up specifically for left leaning Canadians that drew the ones who didn’t want confrontation towards. At the same time the moderation team started recruiting and low and behold were hammered with right wing applications until they have what is essentially moderators from the r/The_Donald. Now there’s multiple Canadian sub reddits and almost all are heavy right leaning to the point you can’t post even moderate stuff. It all has to be headlines like “Lookie what these brown fellas are doing now”.

          Crazy times. Even saw voices that were kind of cool become social pariahs as online users seemed to unanimously agree that “science guy 1” was faking it and pompous and “science guy 2” was also a giant piece of shit. We’re not even leftists but were people who would convince people to think critically and question even your own views. Could not let those channels and people grow. We all had to read about their vocal fry every time they posted a video. Decimated engagement for every voice the left tended to enjoy and who acted as lightning rods for different ideas and values such as common sense and logic were knee capped by the denizens of these newly seized territories who all unanimously agreed that these people were annoying. And since we’re social creatures, if you have 1000 voices saying someone is annoying and 10 say “what the fuck is going on in this comment section” we all tend to really focus on the annoying bits wondering about it ourselves until its just a truth. Meanwhile middle aged Comedian with views like “Students are shitting in litter boxes” and “Maybe wearing masks will kill you” were amplified.

          Internet was a new frontier and seems like groups that had resources really seized on the opportunity to take back territory so they could relay a foundation that was pro their own cause. I think the left had a big part in helping without realizing it because they just didn’t care to see what was happening. Like a death by 10 000 paper cuts.

          • nomous@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            30 years ago rightwing talk radio was in full swing, already influencing huge swaths of America with their formulated, repeated talking points (something “the left” or even the Democratic party still can’t do), Rush Limbaugh had a TV show on one of the 4 major networks. For sure everything has picked up recently but they’ve been at this for decades, what we’re seeing now is the result of all the groundwork they’ve laid.

            It’s a long listen but worth checking out How Conservatism Won by Robert Evans. He lays out in a clear concise way “how a consortium of rich failsons got together to fund a network of right wing think tanks and shift American culture in a fun new direction. (note: it was not actually fun at all).” They’ve been very successful and those think tanks are now pipelines used to funnel ideological purists into powerful positions like our current Supreme Court.

            I tell people as often as I can, especially my trans and bipoc friends; now is the time. Get a couple guns (a long one and a short one) and learn how to use them. Learn some basic first aid, you really just need to know how to stabilize someone. Start networking with like-minded people in your communities. The police will not protect us, they’ve proven they’ll happily club senior citizens to the ground and shoot any protesters in the face with rubber bullets while escorting a rightwing murderer to safety.

            Iran was a secular, liberal state until almost 1980 when they (mostly legitimately) elected an Islamist theocracy; it could happen here.

            edit: tl;dr the shadowy cabals the rightwing says are behind everything is classic projection again, they’re controlled by shadowy cabals of rich people

            edit edit: it’s worth remembering that one of the primary ghouls/traitors responsible for the attempted overthrow of our government on J6 was Roger Stone, the same traitorous ratfucker who began his career working for Nixon and has a fucking Nixon tattoo on his back. It’s really impossible to overstate just how fuckin’ bad these people are and they’re winning.

    • Optional@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 days ago

      We really should have taken the criticisms of television a million times more seriously. Also environmental concerns, but, i digress.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      4 days ago

      Her coworkers have dealt with 11 year old boys straight up telling female teachers they don’t have to listen to them because they’re women.

      That’s hardly new. Obnoxious pre-teens finding any excuse to rebel are just a hazard of middle school life.

      Andrew Tate’s brand of misogyny is the thing YouTube loves to promote in between Spider-Man Vaccinating Pregnant Elsa and Hysterical Child Unboxing videos. But if it wasn’t him, it could just as easily be Blink-182 lyrics or kids immitating what they saw in a Caillou episode.