• Dudewitbow
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      its generally happening in any country that has a reletively speaking, high GDP, because regardless of where you are in the world, the wealth tends to collect in a small group of people rather than get spread out.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 months ago

      It might be the media distorting it, but it seems like it’s an especially big issue in East Asian countries. I didn’t know about Singapore, but I know it’s a serious issue in both South Korea and Japan, which are about to have a huge number of elderly and not enough people to care for them.

  • Jeena@piefed.jeena.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    4 months ago

    0.97 PFF! Wake me up again when they’re down at 0.52 like Korea, then you might get my attention.

  • Gakomi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    4 months ago

    I wish it was the same ale over the world, we are too fucking many as it is!

      • Gakomi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        4 months ago

        Doubt it, in the last 20 years we grew from 7 billion to 8. When that number goes to 4 I will be happy!

        • megane-kun@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Both can be true, that we’re experiencing record low birth rates globally and that the global population is still increasing at the moment.

          How?

          1. While birth rates in many countries have fallen below replacement rate, it’s still not zero, which means people are still having babies.
          2. Due to advances in health science, the death rate has fallen.

          These two factors, especially decades earlier, mean that population hasn’t yet fallen. However:

          1. Non-existent humans will not produce babies.
          2. The older the population is on the average, the higher the death rate will be.

          This means that if I don’t produce offspring, my non-existent offspring will not produce babies. The less babies are produced, the older the population would be, and the higher the death rate will be. If current trends continue, the death rate will overtake the birth rate, and the population will shrink.

          Outside of a worldwide disaster that kills off people of child-bearing age, population will still rise before it levels off and then fall off as more and more people find less and less appealing to raise children. This is just a consequence of us humans not dying immediately after childbirth, and us humans as a whole making offspring at a certain age (say, 20 years old). These two factors explain the lag between childbirth figures and population growth.

          • Gakomi@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            4 months ago

            Ok then we talk in 50 years and if the population is still above 4 billion I still will have a problem with this!

            • megane-kun@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              4 months ago

              If you have such a problem with too many people existing, do something about it. IDK.

              • Gakomi@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 months ago

                I’m a nobody on the internet do I look like I got access to all the nuclear codes or something ? Simply put I can’t you can’t and no one can!