• Hegar@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    That’s not sufficient.

    A biased fact checking bot should not be allowed to operate in a public forum, giving weight to it’s opinions as though it were a neutral source of truth.

    If you want its services, you can go to their website and use it. It shouldn’t be here.

    • yesman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      I think you’ve inadvertently demonstrated the problem with calling out media “bias”.

      as though it were a neutral source of truth.

      I would be interested to lean what, if anything, you’d say meets this description.

    • bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      3 months ago

      Report it to the mods, if they consider it is providing “low-effort comments” (Rule 5) then they can block the bot from the community. Else you can block on your own user level.

      • solsangraal
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        3 months ago

        i vote to keep the bot, for no other reason than that dude’s butthurt about it

      • kitnaht@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Blocking it at the user level effectively amplifies it, because then he doesn’t see and downvote it any longer.