• RNAi [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    76
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    millionaire

    So a tenth of USians own a shitty home they inherited in some godforsaken suburb?

    Empire core inflation is fun

  • sewer_rat_420 [he/him, any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    4 months ago

    Millionaires are not your enemy. Being a millionaire is enough to provide decent housing and a nice living. In reality, we should all be millionaires (or have the lifestyle of a current day millionaire) were wealthy distributed equitably.

    In fact, it is important to have those with wealth in the movement as well as the poor and downtrodden. There are those wealthy enough to materially support the cause but not to wealthy that they lose sight of the cause.

    This is mostly my personal opinion of course but as others pointed out, a million isn’t really that much. A single million, invested wisely in index funds and bond funds, assuming the similar rate of growth (4%) and stable society, isn’t enough to live “lavishly,” although it would certainly be enough to live as a $40,000 annual budget.

  • CyborgMarx [any, any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    4 months ago

    Realistically the money doesn’t exist it’s just potential liquidity, but the feeling of being a millionaire definitely does, those people will never in a million years support even the most lukewarm proto-socialist development and the fact their money is an abstract concept strengthens that conviction because it generates a form of social anxiety

  • Procapra [comrade/them, she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    4 months ago

    Millionaire as in, has 1mil in their bank account? 1 mil in stocks? Or 1mil in assets (home, car, etc)?

    IMO, it is way different to have a million dollars in your bank or in stocks, than to have like, an 800k home with a nice job.

    • lil_tank [any, he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yeah it’s probably something like the sum of all your belongings.

      Typical scenario of grandparents bought a house in a poor neighborhood and two generations later gentrification made it 10 times more valuable so their middly privileged grandchildren are now technically millionaires

  • bam13302@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    4 months ago

    Considering 1 million is arguably an insufficient amount to retire on, I’m honestly sad that number isn’t higher. Retirement is just not something some people are even considering anymore.

    • Dyskolos
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      In the US that probably ain’t cut it. Here it’d be enough. Depends on your hobbies and lifestyle though. 100k nets me 3k on the cheapest, lowest risk-investment monthly. So 500k for a tiny house and 500k invested and you could have a bare decent life forever.

      I worked like 1yr out of boredom in the last 30yrs.

  • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Well 100% Poles was millionaires too, during the hyperinflation. At least for a day or two each month before repos and banks eaten what was remaining of our wages after new private masters helped themselves.