• Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    The Hobbit was meant for kids. Then Tolkien was like, “what if I took that story that was meant for kids and wrote a really long, complicated series of sequels to it that kids of the right age to read The Hobbit will probably get bored with and stop reading half-way through the first book?”

    Nothing against LOTR, I’m just doubtful most 10-year-olds read it.

    • dustyData@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      LOTR was not written for children. It was literary fiction to talk about Tolkien’s experiences with the Great war mixed with a lot of his philology studies. Some even say the LOTR world was just Tolkien’s excuse to use his constructed languages. The Hobbit existed first as loose night time stories for his own kids that got formalized as a book and had no concept of the wider LOTR lore. The success inspired him to write another book, for a wider audience and more complex themes. Then he decided that the Hobbit could be made to fit into the overall world building of middle earth. So he made changes to both books so they fit together. That’s why the first and second edition of The Hobbit are actually a bit different.

    • stoly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      It’s literature, broadly speaking, and was never intended to be specifically for children. I think he wrote the Hobbit for children and LOTR for himself.