• vga@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Dunno what kind of economic model we’d need if we had star trek -level replication technology.

    • normalexit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 hours ago

      We could just explore, try to learn new interesting things, and have campy holodeck adventures with Mark Twain.

      I don’t think the current rich people would approve. But screw’em if we have replicators

    • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I always thought the “you wouldn’t download a car” ads were based on an assumption that star trek replicator technology would be evil (with the public argument that it would put people out of jobs and the real reason being it would be harder to base a wealth-based hierarchy and system of middlemen on).

      • Ultraviolet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 hours ago

        The original ad was “you wouldn’t steal a car,” literally claiming that downloading a movie is morally equivalent to carjacking.

        • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Ah, yeah, it might have been the implication that they were equivalent that got me thinking that rather than them using “download” instead of “steal”.

          They also lost me with the sappy ads about the crews that don’t make millions from the movies, as if the studios would even be able to produce movies without paying crews (and weren’t already doing everything they could to reduce that expense).

          Especially when I knew that it was the studios’ fault theatres had to gouge people on snacks because those greedy fucks wanted all of the ticket sales money, despite theatres requiring money to run and maintain.

          And don’t get me started on Hollywood accounting and how it was used to claim Return of the Jedi made 0 profit to fuck over the actor behind one of the most iconic roles in film (who wanted royalties instead of a set pay but made the mistake of believing they were negotiating with him in good faith and weren’t just fucking vultures).

    • MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Need? None, really. It’s like when you get to the North Pole, the entire concept of “north” breaks down. It would be the same with post-scarcity. Or should be, except…

      Have? Completely up to the whims of whoever controls the technology. Which… takes a look at the planet will be whoever is left standing once the nut jobs wipe out everyone that they hate. “Computer, ICBM, nuclear.”

  • Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Picked up the Bluray series off eBay. Physical media seems like the way to go, to really own anything

    • MeatsOfRage@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      … Ripped to a media server. It’ll be a cold day in hell before I can be arsed to stand up and put media into a machine anymore.

    • cm0002@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Physical media seems like the way to go, to really own anything

      That or sailing the digital sea, which ig you could consider a bunch of DRM-free files on a drive you own to still be “physical media”

      • TheKMAP@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Do you really think the automation governments use don’t understand euphemism. Just say piracy.

        • cm0002@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Do you really think people say things like sailing the digital sea to avoid persecution? Just say whatever sounds cool to you

  • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    17 hours ago

    The federation is like living at your parent’s house. Things are free under their roof, but if you want to drink with Quark, you’re going to have to trade your star fleet allowance for latinum.

  • Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I’m pretty sure by the end, even Roddenberry had come to accept that humans will never be so selfless as a species and the Starfleet he dreamt of could never exist. That’s why his later stuff was more bleak. There’s just absolutely no way that the money free world they describe is good for everyone

    • Supervisor194@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I believe there is a way. Nanotechnology helped along by artificial intelligence could conceivably bring material abundance to everyone. This would be a world dramatically reshaped. Humanity might not even qualify as the same species anymore.

      Some people actually think that such a future is an inevitability; that it can’t be stopped. Short of everybody dying in a fire of course.

      • Taalnazi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        Nederlands
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        My cynical perspective is that people will monetise that nanotechnology before long

        • yeather@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          There has never been a case where governments are able to hide technology from the people for more than a decade at a time in modern history. It might start out expensive, innovations usually do, but over time the expense drops, someone makes a quick buck selling to the masses, and all of a sudden money is meaningless.

          Worst case scenario you may have to use your second amendment rights to acquire the technology for the masses, which is what it was designed for.

  • Kaboom@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Ah yes, because in capitalism, Captains actually own their own ships and you don’t need to pay anyone to actually build it! Just use slaves enthusiastic volunteers!