• A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    177
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’ve been saying this for a while. The real malicious actors are right there in the open, telling you what they’re doing. I think people gravitate toward the clearly fake conspiracies because it helps soothe their conscience - clearly their guy is Different, you don’t even have to think about it, right?

    • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s wild how long the Republicans have been plainly stating what their goals are, and people keep looking for alternative, easier to accept explanations.

    • darthelmet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      It’s still crazy to me how much of the bad shit the government has done has been declassified and publicly available and people still just kind of ignore it. Who needs censorship when people are just willing to overlook reality? Or even worse, just make up nonsense.

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      There’s also a feeling of “knowing” more than other people. You don’t know about how Albert Einstein and Nikola Tesla invented a time traveling aircraft carrier? Have I got some research that you need to do on your own. But if you did know about it, then it’s junk meant to distract you from what’s really going on.

      None of that “knowledge” derives from any level of credible sources, but it does bring a certain level of superiority over people on Facebook. If it’s actually well documented and widely known, then that isn’t something where I get to feel better than other people.

  • distantsounds@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    143
    ·
    1 month ago

    Conspiracy theorists are only interested in the idea of a conspiracy, and lose focus when the conspiracy is found to be true.

    • lets_get_off_lemmy@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      22 days ago

      I have a direct example of this:

      I was at the UFO museum in Roswell, NM and the guy that was giving a talk was a self-described Ufologist and this was after the government released the UFO footage. He talked the whole time about government coverup of past UFO crashes, etc.

      In the Q&A, someone asked if the recent footage gave him hope that we’ll begin to learn more about UFOs now that the government seems more forthright with the information… And he got pissed at them for even asking. It was as if his whole retirement activity of uncovering conspiracies was challenged and his brain couldn’t handle it except by getting angry at an honest question.

      His conspiracy seemed to be more boring than he thought (and spent decades “researching”) so he wouldn’t allow the truth to shatter it. It was fascinating to see in real-time.

  • frazw@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    127
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Conspiracy theorists are not about the actual theories. They are about being special. They are smart and figured out monkeys have been influencing the course of human politics since the roman empire. *They * are the only ones who “get it” that bic biro pens have finger print scanners the CIA uses to locate disobedient citizens.

    As soon as it becomes confirmed, they are no longer special, because everyone “gets it”.

    When they say “wake up sheeple”, they wouldn’t know what to do if you “woke up”.

    • Uli@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      57
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      That’s why the idea of wokeism is so repugnant to right-wing conspiracy theorists. The idea that they are the ones asleep but also there are many others who woke up before them is so counter to their own self-image that they will alter their perception of the world before they will allow such a thing to be true.

  • ceenote@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    The only consistency you should expect from the right wing is that they’ll consistently drop their “principles” the instant it’s convenient.

    • quixotic120@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      anon probably wouldn’t be banned for this but 4chan is astroturfed hard so this would either have a million replies roasting the shit out of it (usually really lazily with lots of lame whataboutism to deflect from anons very valid points) or all of a sudden the board would have an influx of new threads to push this into the archive

  • aesthelete@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Conspiratorial thinking starts with coming up with the conclusion and then piecing together (or manufacturing) evidence to support it.

    These chodes would never start with the conclusion that one of their favorite fashy daddies did something wrong.

  • Isa@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Well, it’s only a bad thing, if the others are doing it. Didn’t you know?

  • RedditRefugee69@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Off topic:

    I’m new to Lemmy so I don’t know if there’s a good workaround for this, but OP posted this to /c/4chan as well as /c/greentext and both came to my feed one after the other.

    Am I supposed to block OP for cross posting, block one of the two communities? Both ideas seem kinda stupid.

    • crimeschneck@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s because OP made two separate posts and therefore uploaded the image twice so lemmy doesn’t recognize it as cross-post (check the image URLs, they are different). If OP properly cross-posted it, the URL would be the same and you wouldn’t see it twice in your feed.

    • subignition@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 month ago

      I usually ignore that kind of thing. If it’s excessive (5+ communities) and the user does it habitually, I consider blocking.

      Some frontends, like PieFed’s, are smart enough to collapse crossposts into one entry, showing only the post with the most engagement.

        • subignition@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          I don’t know the details of how PieFed does it, but there is a button underneath whichever post is considered the ‘main’ one where you can view the details of other crossposts and visit them if you like.

    • randomdeadguy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 month ago

      If this is a one-time event, I would ignore & move on. If I ever see more than three posts in a row by a user, I block that user. It doesn’t have to be permanent.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      If you think something is wrong if you see the same thing more than once, you’re gonna have a bad time. Not only do things get crossposted between communities with different names, they also get crossposted between communities with the same name on different instances. Big political news often shows up a half-dozen times, or more.

      TL;DR: get used to it.

    • acosmichippo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      I would just ignore it once or twice, I don’t find it to be a big problem when browsing All. But if it becomes a repeat nuisance for you, since they seem to be two communities for basically the same thing, I would see if one is significantly more active than the other and block the less active one.

    • antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      Seeing double posts is IMO not frequent enough to require mechanisms to fix it (and I can’t even imagine a built-in mechanism against it).

      c/greentext should be blocked because it’s full of annoying fake stories, though.

  • Asafum@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 month ago

    They’re all too happy to be “drinking liberal tears.” They never truly gave a shit about it, they just wanted “to win” and those perceived slights hinderd their chances at winning. Now that it’s in their favor they couldn’t possibly care less and if anything are happy it’s happening in part because of their lust for revenge and in part because they get “to win.”