• Baphomet_The_Blasphemer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    It’s certainly not a luxury sports car, but in the current state of things, I’d say all sports cars are expense as they’re rarely owned or operated as a primary daily drive vehicle. Owning a second car for fun certainly sounds expensive to me.

      • scoobford
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        A sports car is a car intended to be used for sporting purposes, like a sporting rifle. The exact sport doesn’t need to be specified, because you can use it for several different kinds of sport.

          • SolarMonkey@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Well, LaCrosse, apparently… for Buick anyway.

            (Ok ok so it’s not a sports-car, but it IS a sports car ~_^)

          • BigPotato@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            Would you claim the second an athlete leaves the field they’re no longer an athlete?

            “Sports” cars are tuned towards their racing counterparts. Auto racing is a sport. We don’t know if that owner does autocross, probably not, but that is classified as a Sports Car regardless of anything else.

      • HeavyRaptor
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Motorsport. If break dance can be a sport why not this?

        What term would you want to use for a fast, light, high performance vehicle instead?

        • Honytawk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Inefficient glass cannons