Spooky stuff that helps explain a lot of the dysfunction flowing out from Microsoft.

    • froztbyte@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      3 days ago

      the poster themselves would have to answer but generally I find the answer to be no

      a rather particular form of inductive reasoning. not quite induncetive, but close

          • o7___o7@awful.systems
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Being so aggressively mid will frequently get you the mean.

            Edit: Before you pedantically argue that the median != mean, I’d suggest that your posts plainly fall on the normal curve because they are all typically boring, standard deviations.

            • self@awful.systems
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              17
              ·
              2 days ago

              it’s fucking amazing the volume of these guys who think we have a rule about tone (we don’t, we never will, spaces with rules like that end up using them against justifiably angry marginalized people) because it’s what they’re used to using as a weapon in the politics sections of reddit and lemmy, but don’t bother to see what our only written rule is (because they don’t fucking read, there’s no room for that when your whole personality is cosplaying as the smart adult in the room)

      • self@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        2 days ago

        you’re about to waste my fucking time but:

        Mindset theory itself is incredibly controversial for a number of reasons, chief of which is that nobody can seem to reliably replicate the results of Dweck’s academic work.

        Ed links an article that talks about elements of the replication crisis in enough detail for an article where the replication crisis isn’t anywhere near on-topic, and I don’t think the article would be better if it included that detail

        feel free to include evidence in your reply that you aren’t here to be a debate shitlord

        • YourNetworkIsHaunted@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          2 days ago

          I’m also confused as to what the takeaway was supposed to be here. Like, because a whole bunch of different famous psych studies fail to replicate maybe this one is less invalid?

          Also, were they expecting Ed Zitron of all people to not write a polemical?

        • froztbyte@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          2 days ago

          (as usual) I made the mistake of looking at their posting history

          three internet cookies if you know what’s behind door number one

            • gerikson@awful.systems
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              15
              ·
              2 days ago

              I will never forget the dude who argued online that the sealion is the real victim here (a victim of the “disgruntled female”)

              • self@awful.systems
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                11
                ·
                2 days ago

                amazingly, I’ve seen (and I think banned) people who’ve tried to sealion about the sealion comic. these assholes really are shameless public masturbators

            • TempermentalAnomaly@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              11
              ·
              2 days ago

              I’m familiar with the original comic. If every attempt to engage in sincere conversations across different points of view on the internet is interpreted sealioning, then there’s no room for sincere engagement.

              But this is a matter of perception. Am I a troll or some who sincerely disagrees. I had an honest critique of the article so I expected some heat, but I was that there would be some sincere criticism of the idea. Rather, and shame on me for thinking otherwise, I’ve been called names and my criticism has been dismissed whole cloth. I’m a little surprised that this is as hurtful as it is and that I’m surprised that I am this pricked. Not exactly sure why I continue. Any case, that’s my reply. Good day, sir!

              • self@awful.systems
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                13
                ·
                2 days ago

                I’m a little surprised that this is as hurtful as it is and that I’m surprised that I am this pricked

                yeah let me help you out with that

                we’ve been on the internet long enough to know how a debate shitlord says “go fuck yourself” and you came in fucking swinging

                who in the fuck introduces themselves to strangers like this? of course people are hostile

                anyway you failed to prove you’re not a debate shitlord so

                ban reason: debate shitlord

                bye