• Flax@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    42
    ·
    14 days ago

    Jesus fills the space perfectly ❤️‍🔥✝️❤️

    • MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      14 days ago

      They got a point, people often fill that hole with religion. Though i personally think it’s better to fill it with knowledge instead.

      • Flax@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        19
        ·
        14 days ago

        The knowledge of how God became man and died for us

          • Flax@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            13 days ago

            You have faith in your car based on the knowledge that it’ll get you to your destination

            • zqps@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              13 days ago

              That’s a linguistic bait-and-switch. Your example has nothing to do with religious faith as a basis for conviction.

                • zqps@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  13 days ago

                  You’re not convincing anyone by misusing words.

                  Here, let me demonstrate: I have hard evidence that God doesn’t exist. My evidence is faith.

                  • Flax@feddit.uk
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    12 days ago

                    My evidence isn’t faith. My faith is based in historical fact.

                • TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  13 days ago

                  That’s a very strange video. The apostles were religious fanatics willing to throw down their lives for their faith before their savior was executed. https://www.thebritishacademy.ac.uk/blog/how-new-testament-was-created/ The official accounts were written down 20+ years after the events portrayed. That’s ample time for someone to forget details and fabricate events. The life expectancy at that time was something like 35 years so most of the people who could object to discrepancies were dead anyway.

                  • Flax@feddit.uk
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    12 days ago

                    20 years isn’t long for ancient writings. A lot of history we have from that time is written hundreds of years after the fact, while this was merely decades. And it’s pretty consistent. For legends to form typically, generations had to pass, yet the earliest records show Christians always believing that Jesus rose from the dead, leaving little room for speculation or evolution. Contrast this to Marian dogmas where things get added on like the perpetual virginity, her being sinless, assumption of Mary, etc, which are small details developing over centuries. Or St Patrick and the snakes. While the Gospel accounts just pop up at around the same time close to Jesus’s life on earth.

                    Secondly - that 35 year number is flawed. Averages are calculated by adding up the lifespans and dividing the total number by amount of statistics. People weren’t dying at 35. Instead, there was a high infant mortality rate. Caesar was assassinated at 55 years old, Tacitus died at 64. Gordian I lived to be 79, Celsus to 75.

    • Owl@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      14 days ago

      Why is this downvoted ? Comment OP stated their belief in a non aggressive/judging manner.

        • zqps@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          13 days ago

          Generally I’m with you, I truly dislike seeing downvote trains. But here I get it. This was a misguided attempt at proselytizing, trying to pass off faith in place of understanding.

          • A_Very_Big_Fan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            12 days ago

            Don’t get me wrong, I downvoted them too lol. It’s just the downvote train + tactless replies reek of Reddit.

      • AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        13 days ago

        Because these types usually think their religion is objectively true and view non believers as less than they are, here’s this person shitting on Islam for example: https://lemm.ee/post/46393021/15935358

        Sadly it’s the minority of religious people that seem to be able to respect others and not use their religion as a tool of discrimination.

      • Flax@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        16
        ·
        14 days ago

        Matthew 10:22a

        and you will be hated by all for my name’s sake.