• Allonzee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    It’s an assassination because the dead person had way more social|political|economic power than the killer.

    So… only bad power seeking people that cross those they have tangible power over to the point of vengeance.

    Fuck, in this hellscape of corruption and captured governments world? I’m sold. You should sell the concept of assassination more often. You’re good.

    • Nougat@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yeah, I’m not sure why the downvotes on my previous comment. “Assassination” is the “privilege” of the powerful.

      • BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Assassinations are typically politically motivated. We don’t know what his motivation was yet, so calling it an assassination is jumping to conclusions.

      • Chozo@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        I’m not sure why the downvotes on my previous comment.

        Because apparently noting what makes this killing different from others means you love slobbing on CEO knob, or something. That’s my takeaway from this thread so far.