It’s clear that PEGI don’t understand the industry at all.
I would expect this kind of Puritanical pearl clutching in the US, not Europe.
Apparently, any game that uses straights, flushes, and full houses gets an adults-only rating, but games with addictive psychological dark patterns designed to maximize microtransaction revenue are fine for children. What a world we live in.
It’s true that playing for money is a huge part of playing poker at all, both casually and professionally. Does that mean a game just teaching poker hands should be considered as adult as actual gambling? If so, a game like The Binding of Isaac should get the same 18+ as Balatro since it has actual slot machines that you put money into, but instead it gets a 16+.
I didn’t realize they pegged Balatro at PEGI 18. Definitely ridiculous. Kids play poker all the time without gambling. It’s a card game. I don’t think there is a less objectionable game out there.
Agreed that it’s ridiculous, but there are plenty of other games out there that are less objectionable, like ones that are played almost exclusively by kids.
The only apolitical game is Tetris.
… not counting the story of developing and distributing Tetris.
I don’t think there is a less objectionable game out there.
Candyland?
Okay but that’s not a game, it’s an existential crisis.
Who is/are the author/s behind this piece? Could you please link to them?
Not mine, but Here ya go
Oh shit, I thought PEGI 18 was a game publisher. It seemed like their start screen logo was on all the best stuff.
Wait, for real - or am I missing a joke here?
In case I’m not, are you also confused about middleware like Bink, Havok and SpeedTree?
Those at least say what they are. Bink will say it’s a video encoder. I just remember a voice saying “PEGI 18” but no other stuff about what that meant so I thought it was a publisher.
