Unnecessary and deeply concerning bow to the new “king”

  • LandedGentry
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    Your comparison would be appropriate if this was a statement coming out in favor of spyware. Additionally if we looked more closely at who you support, I bet we would find some pretty egregious contradictions with your values/the business’s purported values.

    All of us would fail at some point if we were scrutinized. That’s why an all or nothing purity test is not productive. We do the best we can where possible and accept that none of us truly have the 100% perfect moral high ground. So it follows that to hold others to that standard is ridiculous.

      • LandedGentry
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        He’s not taking about spyware or anything like it. You’re forcing this.

        • glimse@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Spyware was just an example? Proton is all about privacy and this board member is saying good things about a guy who doesn’t think us peasants should have any.

          I agree that this isn’t the worst thing to ever happen. But I also agree with the people saying he shouldn’t have said anything.

          • LandedGentry
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            4 hours ago

            You’re still reaching. A privacy company praising a spyware company is not the same as one member of a board on his own praising Trump for something not even related to privacy. Stop forcing this. You’re reaching.