• lightnsfw@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      10 hours ago

      That’s probably part of the plan. They want the post office gone to make room for private companies. Fuck all the people that live in remote areas where it isn’t profitable to have mail I guess.

    • teamevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      67
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Which the stupid Republicans will use to continue to try to privatize something that should never have been privatized and should never be privatized The Republicans are the Nazis now and they need to be stopped

    • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      27
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Chinese packages are a net negative for the post office, you can probably find articles about that from Trump’s first term.

      • Cornelius_Wangenheim@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        I don’t know why you got down voted because it’s 100% true. NPR did a fairly good episode on it: https://www.npr.org/sections/money/2018/08/01/634737852/episode-857-the-postal-illuminati

        Edit: To summarize, there’s an international org (UPU) that controls the amount postal services can charge each other to deliver mail/parcels. The current due is below what it costs to actually deliver a parcel, so a package from China actually costs the USPS money. That cost gets passed on as higher domestic fees, leading to a situation where a shipper is charged ~5x more to ship something domestically compared to what a company in China is charged to ship to the US.

      • BertramDitore@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        12 hours ago

        The USPS was never intended to turn a profit. It’s not a business. Its entire purpose is to deliver mail to every American, regardless of where they’re located. Making that profitable was never realistic nor necessary for a government service.

        • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          11 hours ago

          It doesn’t have to profit, but it also doesn’t have to subsidize incoming packages from China.

            • bjorney@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              10 hours ago

              The UN Postal Union sets guidelines for international mail that dictates developing countries shouldn’t have to pay full price to send mail to developed countries. Basically if it costs $30 to ship something from a developing country, they would charge $20 and the destination country would pay for the shortfall (dollar values not real). China was a much smaller economy when this agreement was drafted.

              The US renegotiated this agreement with the United postal union in 2019/2020 but there were still come compromises made - while the amount of subsidization is minimal compared to 10 years ago, USPS still allegedly eats some losses on every package from China.

              Basically Trump is mad because the deal he personally negotiated 5 years ago wasn’t good enough. Same thing that happened with his trade agreement with Canada

      • Empricorn@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Everything they do is a “net negative”! My company’s IT and HR departments don’t generate any revenue at all…